Skip to content

Proposed Multitude of Modifications by European Parliament for Sustainability Reporting Regulation

The prospect of sustainability reporting in the European Union faces uncertainty as lawmakers contemplate extensive revisions.

EU flags pass by as individuals walk by
EU flags pass by as individuals walk by

Proposed Multitude of Modifications by European Parliament for Sustainability Reporting Regulation

The future of environmental sustainability reporting in the European Union is uncertain as lawmakers debate extensive changes to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directives (CSDDD). These revisions are part of the European Commission's Omnibus Simplification Package, which is currently under consideration in both the Parliament and the Council.

As part of the European Green Deal, three directives were implemented by the EU to encourage businesses to address climate change and report their greenhouse gas emissions. These directives created a classification system for businesses and investors (the Taxonomy for Sustainable Activities), established requirements for businesses to report their environmental, social, and governance actions (CSRD), and imposed additional reporting requirements and legal responsibilities related to supply chains (CSDDD, also known as CS3D).

However, the cost of these proposals for businesses and the potential impact on the broader EU economy became a campaign issue during the 2024 elections. The shift to the right in EU politics has emboldened opponents of the European Green Deal directives. As a result, the Commission proposed a new package of directives to "reduce the burden" on businesses.

The Omnibus Simplification Package was officially adopted by the Commission in February and is currently being debated in the Council and the Parliament. In the Parliament, the debate is ongoing, with multiple committees involved, offering various proposals to amend the initial legislation.

The Committee on Legal Affairs (JURI) is the primary committee responsible for producing the legislation to be presented for a full Parliament vote. Other related committees will submit opinions during the process. While committees work independently, there will be coordination with party leaders, as well as crossover of committee members.

As the debate continues, two primary themes have emerged. The first is related to the employee thresholds under CSRD and CSDDD. The proposal from the Commission raises the threshold to 1,000 employees. Numerous amendments have been proposed across both committees to lower this threshold, as well as to raise it to 3,000, 5,000, or even 10,000 employees.

Another amendment in the ENVI Committee, submitted by members of The Left, expressed strong opposition to the Omnibus Simplification Package, arguing that the proposed changes take a narrow-minded perspective on competitiveness at the expense of human rights. They also reference a recent complaint filed by the European Ombudsman regarding the Commission's procedural requirements in the Better Regulation Guidelines.

On the other side, Amendment 340 in the ECON Committee, proposed by MEPs from the European People's Party, calls for the full repeal of the CSDDD. The justification asserts that the proposed changes by the Commission do not sufficiently address the concerns of the affected companies and will continue to impose a costly administrative burden with potential legal uncertainty.

The committees have about a month to review the amendments, with the final opinions due in mid-July. The fate of the CSRD and CSDDD will ultimately be decided by the Committee on Legal Affairs and the full vote of the Parliament. The language of the final Omnibus Simplification Package will also need to be agreed upon by the Council, Commission, and Parliament, with ongoing negotiations expected in the coming months.

  1. The European Union's debate on comprehensive changes to the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), part of the European Commission's Omnibus Simplification Package, has been fueled by science and environmental-science discussions, as lawmakers weigh the impact of these proposals on climate change and the broader EU economy.
  2. Amidst the ongoing discussions in the European Union about the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), politics and general-news have focused on the potential implications of these directives on corporate sustainability, social responsibility, and governance, as well as their impact on human rights and competitiveness within the EU.

Read also:

Latest