Skip to content

Has the environment improved during your tenure, Steffi Lemke?

aspired for the role of Minister

Born in Dessau in 1968, Steffi Lemke served as a Member of the Bundestag from 1994 to 2002 and...
Born in Dessau in 1968, Steffi Lemke served as a Member of the Bundestag from 1994 to 2002 and again since 2013. She held the position of Federal Business Manager for the Greens from 2002 to 2013. In 2021, Lemke assumed the role of Federal Minister of the Environment.

Has the environment improved during your tenure, Steffi Lemke?

New Take:

Steffi Lemke, the Green Party's former Minister of the Environment from Dessau, held the prestigious role for three and a half years. On May 6, she relinquished her government seat to Carsten Schneider, but not before launching the first National Marine Protection Conference on her final day in office. This conference aimed to recover thousands of tons of toxic World War II ammunition submerged in the North and Baltic Seas (Read more on ntv).

Steffi Lemke discussed the marine protection conference and her ambitious plans with Clara Pfeffer on the Klima-Labor podcast.

Q: Why remotasmo01 (ntv) aggressively highlighted your conference on your last day in office?

A: Marine preservation has remained largely ignored in German federal politics due to a lack of marine territory. Nevertheless, the seas are crucial for climate, food supply, and oxygen production. Steffi Lemke aimed to rectify this oversight by giving marine protection the attention it deserves (Details).

Q: Is there anything concrete happening?

We've started recovering World War II ammunition from both the North and Baltic Seas. These toxic deposits have been releasing harmful substances into the water for years. The program now has funding, and preliminary test removals have occurred. Another significant milestone is the high seas protection agreement: For the first time, marine protected areas can be designated on the high seas (More info).

Q: Why focus on the ammunition now if it hasn't posed an issue earlier?

The ammunition was carelessly dumped into the sea after World War II without considering the potential harm it could cause later. Now, it's rusting and disintegrating, releasing dangerous chemicals. Evidence of this is already apparent in local mussels. Removal of the ammunition should take place as soon as possible, although this is a complicated process never attempted worldwide before.

Q: What's next after recovery?

Our plan is to build a floating facility on a platform at sea to destroy the recovered ammunition. If this works, it could serve as a model for other nations (Source).

Q: Lemke received €3.5 billion for the "Natural Climate Protection" program—the most significant sum from any previous Environment Ministry. Has the environment improved?

The program aims to rehabilitate wetlands, moors, and old forests to store CO2 and retain more water in the landscape. This helps combat droughts and floods. However, the program could take a few years to show tangible results.

Q: Money makes the world go round in environmental protection, no?

Yes, the days of environmentalists begging for scraps of funding are behind us. The environment requires substantial investment to make a meaningful impact (Reference ).

Q: Is your successor in the black-red coalition up for the task?

The coalition agreement is a cause for concern. It barely addresses climate, environmental, and nature protection, overshadowed by environmentally harmful subsidies. I've yet to truly understand the black-red actors when it comes to forest management, water systems, or drying moors.

Q: Would you have preferred staying Environment Minister?

While the German democracy doesn't lack boisterous voices, my focus was on achieving results rather than seeking the spotlight. Environmental and climate progress requires perseverance, and I'm proud to have served as Environment Minister (Full interview).

Q: Did you face opposition in your personal life?

I encountered disagreements, but day-to-day conversations were mostly supportive or understanding. Some people even empathized with the difficult decisions and responsibilities I had to make. The election results, however, were disappointing (Guess where).

Q: Did the Greens neglect core themes such as the environment in their campaign?

Climate change impacts water, food, and biodiversity, in addition to affecting ecological and technical aspects. These broader impacts were probably overlooked in the campaign, contributing to the Greens' poor showing in the election (Conclusion).

Clara Pfeffer interviewed Steffi Lemke. The conversation has been modified for improved understanding.

For more information on climate protection and related discussions, tune into the ntv podcast Klima-Labor every Thursday (Link).

Klima-Labor, brought to you by ntv.

Contact us with your questions at [email protected] or directly to Clara Pfeffer and (Christian Herrmann).

Privacy Policy

Sources:

  • ntv.de
  • dw.com
  • unsplash.com
  • euobserver.com
  • reuters.com
  • theguardian.com
  1. Steffi Lemke, during her tenure as the Green Party's Minister of the Environment, focused on environmental issues such as marine protection, climate, and environmental science in policy-and-legislation, working to address climate change's impacts on water, food, and biodiversity.
  2. As part of her marine preservation efforts, Steffi Lemke launched the first National Marine Protection Conference and mobilized resources to remove toxic World War II ammunition submerged in the North and Baltic Seas, acknowledging the environmental concerns related to science and the climate-change, especially in the context of the environmental-science.
  3. Looking ahead, Steffi Lemke's successor might face challenges in maintaining the focus on marine protection, climate, and environmental initiatives, given the coalition agreement's apparent oversight of these areas, suggesting a need for ongoing advocacy and input from various voices within politics and the general-news.

Read also:

Latest