Skip to content

Burlington Centre pays $649K for police but sees no officers in sight

A $4.75M tax bill includes $649K for police, but the mall's security still relies on private guards. Who's really protecting these public spaces?

The image shows a group of police officers standing in front of a crowd of people wearing black...
The image shows a group of police officers standing in front of a crowd of people wearing black uniforms and helmets. In the background, there are buildings, trees, poles, traffic signals, and boards with words written on them, all of which appear to be slightly blurred.

By Jim Porthouse

Burlington Centre pays $649K for police but sees no officers in sight

March 30th, 2026

BURLINGTON, ON

The high cost of municipal policing-averaging $200,000 annually per officer when accounting for salary, oversight, and equipment-has sparked a debate over resource allocation in commercial hubs. Large retail centers, such as the Burlington Centre, often face a 'double taxation' dilemma: they contribute significantly to the police budget through property taxes while simultaneously funding private security to manage on-site safety.

Is the Burlington Centre getting value for money based on the taxes they pay? Doesn't look that way.

The Financial Breakdown

Using the 2025 tax data for a major shopping center like Burlington Centre as a case study:

| Metric | Value (Approx.) | | --- | --- | | Total Property Tax Paid | $4.75 Million | | Police Service Allocation | 13.66% | | Direct Contribution to Police | $649,000 |

The 13.66 % is of the 4.75 million paid in taxes

Since these tax costs are bundled into commercial rent and eventually passed down to consumers through retail pricing, the public effectively pays twice-once for a public police force that is often absent from the premises, and again for the private guards required to deter theft.

A Shift in Priorities

There is a growing argument that police departments have drifted away from 'back-to-basics' community presence. Despite Burlington being a generally safe area, the current model prioritizes administrative tasks, highly specialized officers, or high-level interventions over visible foot patrols.

Key Considerations:

  • The Rebate Question: Should businesses that provide their own security be entitled to a tax credit for the police services they aren't receiving?
  • Visibility vs. Volume: The issue may not be a lack of police personnel, but rather their placement. Reallocating existing officers to high-traffic areas like malls could address rising concerns over vehicle and jewelry thefts more effectively than the current reactive model.

The goal is a more equitable system where the police are active participants in community safety, ensuring that tax dollars translate into a tangible, visible presence where it is needed most.

Read also:

Latest