Skip to content
All about sports. — Football — Sports — Bookmakers

Youngsters Kislyak and Batrakov, aged 19, rank among the top 5 highly valued individuals in the Russian Premier League

Major League Football Player Valuations Revealed: CIES Analytics Lists Top 5 Most Expensive Russian Premier League Stars

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
In the CIES Analytics platform's evaluation, the transfer values of football stars from leading...
In the CIES Analytics platform's evaluation, the transfer values of football stars from leading leagues have been determined. Here's a look at the Russian Premier League's top five most valuable players according to their assessment.

Youngsters Kislyak and Batrakov, aged 19, rank among the top 5 highly valued individuals in the Russian Premier League

Check Out the Football Transfer Value Showdown

Analytical powerhouse CIES Football Observatory has shaken up the global football transfer market with its revolutionary player evaluation method. But how does CIES stack up against the giants of the field, such as Transfermarkt?

Let's break down the top 5 most valuable players in the Russian Premier League (RPL), according to CIES:

  1. Player A (Zenit, valued between €29-40 million)
  2. Player B (Lokomotiv, €22-31 million)
  3. Player C (Spartak, €19-26 million)
  4. Player D (Dinamo, €18-24 million)
  5. Player E (CSKA, €15-22 million)

One player who has caught everyone's attention is the young midfielder Player E, who currently commands a much higher evaluation by CIES (€15-22 million) compared to Transfermarkt's €4 million estimate. However, they both agree that Player A is the most valuable player, with transfermarkt valuing him at €25 million.

Want more Football RPL insights? Check out these articles!

  • The Strange Match and the Polygraph Test: several "Wings of the Soviets" players under the needle after a peculiar game against "Pari NN"
  • Taranov: "Player E demonstrates mature play and makes very few mistakes"
  • Player B sets the record as the youngest player in RPL history with 20 goal-scoring actions in a single season

Curious about the methods behind CIES and Transfermarkt valuations? Let me explain!

The CIES and Transfermarkt Comparison: A Deep Dive

1. Player A

  • CIES Valuation: €XX million
  • Transfermarkt Valuation: €YY million
  • The Difference: CIES's algorithmic approach takes into account factors like age, contract length, past performance, and market trends, potentially leading to higher or lower evaluations than Transfermarkt's community-driven valuations.

2. Player B

  • CIES Valuation: €XX million
  • Transfermarkt Valuation: €YY million
  • The Difference: Transfermarkt reflects current market sentiment and recent developments through updates derived from user contributions and expert consensus.

3. Player C

  • CIES Valuation: €XX million
  • Transfermarkt Valuation: €YY million
  • The Difference: CIES might value players with strong domestic performance but less international exposure higher due to potential, while Transfermarkt could be more conservative.

4. Player D

  • CIES Valuation: €XX million
  • Transfermarkt Valuation: €YY million
  • The Difference: Changes in contract situations or injuries could influence one source's model more than the other.

5. Player E

  • CIES Valuation: €XX million
  • Transfermarkt Valuation: €YY million
  • The Difference: The gap between valuations can indicate different market perceptions, with CIES potentially factoring in technical skills and potential transfer market inflation, while Transfermarkt reflects recent market behavior and demand.

Summary & Insights

  • CIES uses a data-driven and mathematical model for objective market value estimation, taking factors like player age, contract situation, historical transfer fees, and performance metrics into account.
  • Transfermarkt relies on community expertise and market rumor monitoring, providing frequent updates through user contributions and expert consensus.
  • In summary, CIES valuations can be more stable and predictive, while Transfermarkt valuations can reflect current market sentiment and recent developments more dynamically.
  • The differences in valuations demonstrate the complementary nature of these two approaches, with both sources offering valuable insights for clubs, agents, and analysts in assessing player market worth.

If you'd like me to share the specific player names and values for the most recent RPL season based on CIES and Transfermarkt, I'd be happy to help! Just let me know.

Bookmakers looking at the Russian Premier League (RPL) might want to consider the discrepancies between CIES Football Observatory and Transfermarkt valuations for certain players. For instance, Player E, a young midfielder, has a much higher evaluation by CIES (€15-22 million) compared to Transfermarkt's €4 million estimate, despite both agreeing on Player A as the most valuable player (€25 million according to Transfermarkt). This suggests a potential disparity in market perceptions and the need for further analysis when making betting decisions.

Read also:

Related

Latest