Skip to content

"You Can't Escape the Consequences"

Refugee Policy Coverage by ARD and ZDF News Channels

Coalition members express disagreement with Dobrindt's decisions, with Justice Minister Hubig of...
Coalition members express disagreement with Dobrindt's decisions, with Justice Minister Hubig of the SPD voicing her criticisms.

The Showdown: Immigration Policy Disputed on ARD and ZDF's Prime-Time Talk Shows

"You Can't Escape the Consequences"

RedditTelegramLinkedInEmailPinterestPrint**Copy Link

The topic of immigration policy is heating up, with asylum seekers and border control at the center of the debate. On Tuesday evening, two heavyweights from the Christian Social Union (CSU) - Alexander Dobrindt and Markus Söder - appeared on ARD's Sandra Maischberger and ZDF's Markus Lanz, respectively. Their appearances shed light on the differing opinions on the matter, which is complex due to recent court rulings.

Juristically, the situation is clear-cut. Last Monday, the Administrative Court in Berlin ruled in favor of three Somalis who had filed a lawsuit against their rejection at the border on May 9. According to an expert, the matter can be summed up as follows: While European law allows asylum seekers to be rejected at the border, only in an exceptional case where there is a threat to public safety and order can this be done. The government is currently invoking this exception, but they are not providing any reasons or arguments to support their decision.

Dobrindt, the Federal Interior Minister, has faced sharp criticism for his decision. He shows disregard for the importance of providing these reasons, believing the policy change serves as a symbol: "We're rejecting, look at us, we're bringing about the asylum turnaround." In this charged atmosphere, a federal interior minister can certainly afford to proceed in such a manner. Nevertheless, some European countries are also violating the Dublin regulations, with Germany being one of them, as established by the court.

On Tuesday evening, Germany seemed to have two CSU men, not entirely in agreement on the issue of rejections, the state of emergency, and the overload facing the country. Dobrindt agrees with the coalition partner CSU's law-and-order man Markus Söder that the Berlin court ruling is not decisive. Dobrindt is continuing to reject asylum seekers at the border, but according to European law, he can only do so if he can justify that Germany is in a state of emergency. Germany is not in a state of emergency, Dobrindt had stated just a few weeks ago. But on Tuesday evening, he seemed to be suggesting that they may be heading towards one.

Söder further complicates the situation by announcing a significant decrease in asylum seekers in Bavaria in the first half of the year. This decrease, according to him, is due to a record number of departures. Germany's housing market, municipalities, and schools are overwhelmed, and the integration process is challenging. However, Söder does not seem to believe this situation constitutes an emergency. Rather, he is concerned about the law not being applied correctly in Europe, posing a threat to public safety and order.

Despite the differing opinions, both CSU men present their theses calmly and confidently. It's troubling, however, to realize that one of Germany's governing parties might be facing serious legal challenges due to their immigration policies. Meanwhile, chaos at the borders continues, and federal police on the ground feel uncertain about the future of the government's most important projects.

Source: ntv.de

Insights:

  • A court in Berlin ruled that the government's policy of turning back asylum seekers at the border is unlawful.
  • While European law allows for the rejection of asylum seekers at the border in exceptional cases, the government has not provided any reasons or arguments to justify this action, which has led to criticism.
  • Germany's housing market, municipalities, and schools are overwhelmed, and the integration process is challenging, but it remains unclear if this constitutes an emergency.
  • The two CSU men present differing opinions on the state of emergency and the justification for the rejections, raising questions about the government's immigration policy and its legality.
  • The court rulings may require the government to reassess its border control policies to ensure compliance with both domestic and international asylum laws.
  1. The disagreement between the two CSU leaders, Alexander Dobrindt and Markus Söder, on immigration policy, particularly border rejections, is a reflection of the complex nature of the issue, compounded by recent court rulings and political debates.
  2. The ongoing controversy surrounding Germany's immigration policy, marked by the court rulings on border rejections, raises questions about the legality of the government's approach and its potential impact on the community, employment, and general news landscape.

Read also:

Latest