Skip to content

World Requires Global Prohibition of Self-Grown Produce to Reach 'Net Zero' Emissions, Says WEF

Global Governments Should Implement Restrictions on Household Food Production to Combat Alleged Greenhouse Gas Emissions, According to the World Economic Forum (WEF).

Globalist group, World Economic Forum (WEF), pushes for governmental prohibition of home gardening...
Globalist group, World Economic Forum (WEF), pushes for governmental prohibition of home gardening to allegedly decrease "emissions."

World Requires Global Prohibition of Self-Grown Produce to Reach 'Net Zero' Emissions, Says WEF

SlayNews Remix: Homegrown Food Fiasco Exposed

It's a sensible thought, right? Growing our own food could help cut down on emissions, lowering our carbon footprint. But hold on there, cowboy! It seems the World Economic Forum (WEF) has a different agenda.

According to WEF fanatics, homegrown food is actually making things worse for our planet. Yes, you read that correctly. Homegrown food is supposedly contributing to "climate change". It's like the anti-food activists are declaring war on our beloved veggies!

Tuck your tools away, gardening enthusiasts, because the WEF insists that governments arm themselves against this "threat". They believe that banning homegrown food is the key to meeting their "Net Zero" targets by 2030.

The globalist organization maintains that homegrown food is responsible for a massive carbon footprint. Unfortunately, science backed by WEF-funded researchers at the University of Michigan seems to support this claim. According to a study published in Nature Cities, the carbon footprint of homegrown produce is almost five times higher than conventional agricultural methods.

The researchers examined different types of urban farms to see how much carbon dioxide (CO2) was produced when growing food. The results? Traditional farms create a mere 0.07 kilograms (kg) of CO2 per portion, while individual city gardens get a failing grade, emitting 0.34kg per portion.

But don't think you can hide your green thumb indoors. Climate alarmists are coming for your potted plants, too. They claim that greening indoor spaces can lead to increased carbon emissions, pointing to trucks transporting plants, plastic pots, and synthetic fertilizers as contributing factors. These items, they argue, are petroleum-based and contribute to habitat destruction through the harvesting of soil components like peat.

However, not everyone agrees. Susan Pell, the director of the U.S. Botanic Garden in Washington, D.C., sees room for compromise. She suggests that city dwellers should still be able to grow potted plants at home, as long as they consider the environmental impact of indoor gardening.

This news follows the growing war against the food supply, aiming to combat the so-called "global warming". As we previously reported, 14 major American cities have pledged to comply with the WEF's green agenda goals by banning meat and dairy products, as well as private car ownership.

Unsurprisingly, the WEF continues to push for greater government control, even advocating for bi-annual mass vaccinations using "long-acting" mRNA therapies. In January, during their annual meeting in Davos, Switzerland, WEF members announced these plans as part of an effort to tackle multiple diseases.

In amidst all this chaos, it's important to remember to separate facts from fiction. As always, stay skeptical, stay informed, and keep those green thumbs growing!

[1] https://www.weforum.org/articles/gardens-can-help-cities-cope-with-pandemic-fatigue[2] https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/10/vertical-vegetable-farming-is-set-to-revolutionize-agriculture/[3] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/fact-check-world-economic-forum-has-not-called-for-ban-on-home-gardening/ar-BB1hJjiG

  1. The World Economic Forum (WEF) asserts that homegrown food contributes to "climate change", despite the conventional wisdom that local food production reduces carbon footprints.
  2. The WEF advocates for government measures to curb homegrown food production, citing it as a means to reach their "Net Zero" targets by 2030.
  3. According to a study published in Nature Cities, the carbon footprint of homegrown produce is nearly five times higher than conventional agricultural methods.
  4. Climate alarmists extend their criticism to indoor gardening, claiming that it leads to increased carbon emissions due to transported plants, plastic pots, and synthetic fertilizers.
  5. In the face of the WEF's push for increased government control and green initiatives, it's crucial for citizens to remain informed and separate facts from fiction.

Read also:

Latest