"Double Trouble"? DFB Fiercely Opposes Plans to Expand World Cup to 64 Teams
World Authority Vehemently Opposes FIFA's World Cup
Facebook ⚽️ Twitter ⚽️ Whatsapp ✉️ Email ✍️ Print ❎️ Copy Link
The football world is buzzing with talk of expanding the 2030 FIFA World Cup to an unprecedented 64 teams. But the German Football Association (DFB) isn't buying it, calling the plan "ridiculous" and "unfeasible" from both a competitive and organizational standpoint.
The DFB has made it perfectly clear that they will not back this proposal. "I've got no intention of supporting this idea because it's just asking for trouble," said DFB President Bernd Neuendorf before the upcoming FIFA Congress. "Organizing a World Cup with 64 teams would be nothing less than chaotic, and I'm not about to stand for that."
The idea of supersizing the World Cup to celebrate its centennial was first floated by the Uruguayan Football Association's president, Ignacio Alonso, in the FIFA Council back in March. FIFA spokesperson later confirmed that the idea was noted, but it's not currently on the agenda for the Congress in Asunción.
Troubling Consequences for National Leagues
Neuendorf wasn't pulling any punches when it came to the potential consequences of the proposed expansion. "Not only would it stretch out the tournament phase, it would be a massive physical drain on the players," he warned. "I've got too much respect for the game and the players to support that kind of exploitation."
The football world isn't exactly united on this contentious issue. While CONMEBOL has thrown its support behind Uruguay's proposal, key football bodies like the Asian Football Confederation AFC and the North, Central American and Caribbean Football Confederation CONCACAF are throwing cold water on the idea. UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin has been particularly vocal in his opposition, describing the plans as "a bad idea."
Uruguay is co-hosting the 2030 World Cup with Argentina, Paraguay, Portugal, Spain, and Morocco, but it looks like the early days of planning are already stirring up controversy. While FIFA is obligated to consider every member's proposal, some have expressed surprise at the spontaneous intervention under the "Miscellaneous" point, with Ceferin saying, "It's odd that we didn't hear about this before."
Some critics argue that the expansion would dilute the competitive standard of the tournament, leading to more one-sided matches and reducing the overall quality of games. Others fear that the qualification process would be devalued as more teams would qualify by default, lessening the prestige of earning a place in the World Cup.
Oponents also point to the logistical challenges that come with doubling the number of matches (from 64 to 128 games) and the potential impact on player fatigue and club schedules. And some stakeholders warn that FIFA hasn't even held the first 48-team World Cup (planned for 2026), suggesting that expanding to 64 teams before fully evaluating the expanded 48-team format is premature.
As the football world gears up for the 2030 World Cup, it looks like there's still plenty of debate to be had. But one thing's for sure: the DFB is keeping its powder dry and its convictions strong when it comes to this proposal.
Sources: ntv.de, tno/sid
Enrichment Data:1. Opponents of the 64-team World Cup plan argue that the expanded format would dilute the overall quality and excitement of the games, potentially resulting in more one-sided matches due to the inclusion of many lower-ranked teams.2. Critics also claim that expanding the tournament could devalue the qualification stages across most continents, as more teams would qualify by default, lessening the prestige and competitive rigor of securing a spot in the World Cup.3. Some stakeholders also highlight the logistical challenges of organizing such a large and complex tournament, which could potentially cause fatigue among players and disrupt club schedules.4. Opposition to the 64-team World Cup plan has also come from key football bodies such as UEFA and CONCACAF, who argue that such expansion is not the right move for the tournament or the broader football ecosystem, including its impact on national teams, club competitions, leagues, and players.5. Some opponents of the plan also suggest that FIFA should focus on evaluating and experimenting with new formats (such as the 48-team World Cup planned for 2026) before rushing to expand to 64 teams.
The European Parliament and the Council, expressed their concerns over the feasibility of expanding the 2030 FIFA World Cup to 64 teams, echoing the DFB's criticism. In contrast, Uruguay, set to co-host the 2030 World Cup with other countries, favors the expansion, particularly its sports counterpart, CONMEBOL. The European leagues, as represented by UEFA President Aleksander Ceferin, oppose the plan, arguing it could lead to devalued qualification stages, dilute the competitive standard, and cause logistical challenges. Despite FIFA's ongoing discussions on the matter, some stakeholders propose considering a more conservative expansion, such as the 48-team World Cup planned for 2026, before jumping to 64 teams.
