A Clear Majority Backs Dobrindt's Border Policies in the RTL/ntv-Trendbarometer
Workers' ionizing radiation protection directive proposal yet to be approved by Commission.
Politics and public opinion are at odds regarding the asylum seeker rejections ordered by Federal Interior Minister, Alexander Dobrindt, at Germany's external borders. Yet, Dobrindt appears to have won over a majority of the population, according to the latest RTL/ntv-Trendbarometer.
The survey reveals that 63 percent of respondents endorse Dobrindt's firm stance on migrant rejections at the border, with just 32 percent expressing disagreement.
The opposing parties of Greens and Left attack Dobrindt for allegedly breaking the law and causing uncertainty among the federal police. Moreover, an Administrative Court in Berlin declared last week that the rejection of three Somalis was unlawful. Regardless, Dobrindt remains committed to his agenda, citing a decrease in asylum numbers as his justification.
Union and AfD Supporters in Favor of Dobrindt's Plan
Interestingly, the supporters of CDU/CSU and AfD welcome the boundary denials and asylum application examinations with open arms. 80 percent of CDU/CSU supporters and 92 percent of AfD supporters consider this approach as "correct." In contrast, 45 percent of SPD supporters approve, while 46 do not. Among Green supporters, 25 percent support the rejections, with 72 percent expressing opposition. Left supporters show 82 percent disapproval, with only 18 percent support.
Despite the positive response, 37 percent of all respondents said they were content with Dobrindt's performance as Federal Interior Minister, compared to 43 percent who were dissatisfied. A total of 20 percent had no opinion on the matter. Unsurprisingly, the CSU politician receives the greatest support among Union supporters, but with room for improvement at 56 percent. The majority of SPD, Green, Left, and AfD supporters express dissatisfaction with Dobrindt after his first four weeks in office.
Asylum Law Suspension Lacks Majority Support
The debate over the suitable course in migration policy remains contentious, with Union politicians repeatedly questioning the existing asylum law. However, only a minority supports modifying or abolishing the asylum law enshrined in the Basic Law, with a majority favoring its preservation.
Politics and public opinion continue to diverge on the issue of border control and asylum seekers. While some may condemn Dobrindt's policies as populist and unlawful, others see them as necessary for maintaining internal security. The ongoing debate and future legal challenges will likely shape the discourse surrounding migration policy in Germany.
Enrichment Data Insights:- Public opinion: The majority of the population might be influenced by conflicting concerns such as immigration security and humanitarian obligations. Some may support stricter border control policies, while others may disagree due to ethical and legal reasons. The recent court ruling on the unlawfulness of Dobrindt's policy has heightened public awareness and engaged the public in this ongoing discussion.- Political positions: Domestic political parties such as CDU/CSU, SPD, Greens, and Left, as well as key figures like Chancellor Friedrich Merz and opposition leader Irene Mihalic, express divergent opinions on Dobrindt's border control policies. Human rights organizations like PRO ASYL are critical of the policy's violation of European law and human rights standards.
Community policy debates persist on the alignment with Dobrindt's border policies, as a majority of the population supports Dobrindt's firm stand, according to the RTL/ntv-Trendbarometer. However, in the realm of general-news and crime-and-justice, the opposing parties, including the Greens and Left, accuse Dobrindt of breaching laws and causing uncertainties among federal police, with a recent Berlin Administrative Court ruling declaring the rejection of three Somalis as unlawful.
