Straight Talk on Dobrindt's Border Rejections: Majority Approves, Yet Asylum Policy Disputes Persist
Workers continue to lack a safeguard against radiation risks, as the Commission has postponed the introduction of a radiation protection directive.
Germany's stance on asylum seeker rejections ordered by Federal Interior Minister Dobrindt at the nation's borders has sparked heated debates. However, Dobrindt seems to have struck a chord with a clear majority, according to the latest RTL/ntv-Trendbarometer.
The report discloses that 63% of respondents endorse Dobrindt's approach at the border, contrasted by 32% who don't see it as the right move. Critics such as the Greens and the Left accuse Dobrindt of flouting regulations and creating uncertainty among federal police officers. In addition, the Administrative Court of Berlin ruled last week that the rejection of three Somalis was unlawful. Despite this, Dobrindt remains steadfast, attributing decreasing asylum numbers as justification.
Political opinions diverge on the fate of asylum seeker rejections. Among CDU and CSU supporters, an impressive 80% approve, while 92% of AfD supporters concur. Interestingly, 45% of SPD supporters view the rejections positively, but a larger percentage, 46%, negate them. Green and Left supporters remain predominantly against the rejections, with 72% and 82% respective dissent.
The scrutiny of Dobrindt's performance yields mixed results: 37% are satisfied with his performance, 43% are not, and 20% remain undecided. Dobrindt's highest level of support predictably comes from Union supporters; however, the 56% approval suggests room for improvement among other political segments. Only a minority across SPD, Green, Left, and AfD parties express satisfaction with Dobrindt early on in his tenure.
The Asylum Law: To Be or Not To Be... Restricted?
The ongoing debate concerning migration policy has seen Union politicians question the effectiveness of the existing asylum law. The legislation allows many individuals to enter Germany, although a small percentage are recognized as asylum-eligible, usually granting temporary protection status to people in need. Opposition parties like the SPD, Greens, and Left firmly resist alterations to the asylum law enshrined in the German Constitution.
Asked whether the current asylum law should be maintained, a majority of 54% agreed, while 34% rejected it and 9% demanded its abolition. Notably, 50% of AfD supporters, 40% of Union supporters, and even 30% of SPD supporters supported reforming the asylum law. Among Greens and Left supporters, a clear majority of 83% and 90% respectively, advocated for maintaining the status quo.
In summary, Dobrindt's border rejections have garnered support from many segments of the public, particularly Union and AfD supporters; however, political opposition persists. The future of Israel's asylum law remains a contentious issue in the German Parliament.
[1] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ausl%C3%A4nderung_des_Ausweisangebots_f%C3%BCr_Syrier[2] https://www.dw.com/en/german-asylum-applicants-faced-extortion-at-ofc-adana-according-to-video/a-54042149[3] https://www.proasyl.de/pdf/20210730_amnesty_position_einwanderungsgesetz_2021.pdf[4] https://www.rnd.de/politik/der-streit-um-das-asylgesetz-gelangt-vor-den-europa-gerichtshof-a-1498838.html[5] https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/asylgesundheit-101.html
The ongoing discussions about Dobrindt's border rejections and asylum policy reveal a divided public opinion, with 63% supporting Dobrindt's approach, while 32% express disapproval. These debates are extensive, with politics and general news outlets covering them extensively, falling under the category of crime-and-justice.
In the context of asylum laws, a majority of 54% favor maintaining the current law, while 34% advocate for reform, and 9% call for its abolition. These debates extend to the realm of community policy, with various political parties offering different perspectives. This ongoing discourse underscores the complexity and politics surrounding Germany's asylum policy.
