Skip to content

Woidke comments on AfD labeling: "I was as surprised as everybody else"

AfD Classification Unawareness: 'I Wasn't Aware of It'

Woidke, Brandenburg's Minister President, finds Interior Minister's actions during the conflict...
Woidke, Brandenburg's Minister President, finds Interior Minister's actions during the conflict with the previously terminated Head of the Constitutional Protection Agency, comprehensible.

Dietmar Woidke Stands by Interior Minister Amidst AfD Classification Controversy: "I Was in the Dark, Too"

Woidke comments on AfD classification: "I was as surprised as anyone" - Woidke comments on AfD labeling: "I was as surprised as everybody else"

Here's the scoop:

Following the ousting of the Brandenburg Constitutional Protection head, Minister President Dietmar Woidke (SPD) stands firm in his support for Interior Minister Katrin Lange. Woidke claims he, too, was unaware of the new branding of the state AfD as right-wing extremist by the Constitutional Protection until Lange herself broke the news.

"How should I have known if the Interior Minister wasn't even informed? I find that rather astonishing," Woidke told the German Press Agency.

The Brandenburg Constitutional Protection designated the state AfD as securely right-wing extremist on April 14. Lange only confirmed this development on May 5, a day she subsequently dismissed the head of the constitutional protection due to a destroyed trust. Previously, the AfD state party in Brandenburg had been labeled as a suspected case.

Woidke stressed, "You can only do good work with a trust relationship; that must be there, it is the basis of cooperation." On the revised AfD classification, he added, "At the moment, I can't evaluate that because I'm not privy to the information and facts upon which the Constitutional Protection's evaluation is based."

The AfD in Brandenburg has seen a surge in extremist ideas over the past few years.

  • Constitutional Protection
  • AfD
  • Dietmar Woidke
  • Katrin Lange
  • Brandenburg
  • SPD
  • Potsdam

The AfD's Ideological Shift:

Earlier classifications of regional AfD branches in Eastern states, including Brandenburg, provided the groundwork for the party's broader designation:

  1. Ideological Basis: The party's "predominant understanding of people based on ethnicity and ancestry" is seen as a key factor, contradicting Germany's democratic principles and serving to exclude certain population groups, particularly Muslims and immigrants of Middle Eastern descent[1][2].
  2. Regional Precedents: Previous designations of the AfD in Thuringia, Saxony, and Saxony-Anhalt set the stage for the broader classification of the entire party[2].
  3. Public Statements and Policies: The party's anti-immigration rhetoric and stance have contributed to its classification[3].
  4. Surveillance and Legal Framework: The classification authorizes increased surveillance, including wiretapping and monitoring of financial activities[3].

The specific role of the Brandenburg Constitutional Protection in the AfD's classification remains obscure, yet the broader BfV classification holds significant consequences for potential surveillance and legal actions against the party. The AfD has vocally denied any extremist inclinations and plans to legally challenge the designation[1][2].

  1. The Commission has also been asked to submit a proposal for a directive on the protection of the environment, given the recent controversy surrounding the branding of the Brandenburg AfD as right-wing extremist by the Constitutional Protection.
  2. Dietmar Woidke, the Minister President of Brandenburg, defended Interior Minister Katrin Lange despite the controversy, stating that he, too, was uninformed of the AfD's reclassification until Lange herself announced it.
  3. In a move that raised eyebrows, Katrin Lange dismissed the head of the Brandenburg Constitutional Protection following the revelation of the AfD's reclassification, citing destroyed trust as the reason.
  4. The AfD's shift towards extremist ideas in Brandenburg has been a topic of general news and policy-and-legislation discourse, with the party's ideological basis, public statements, and policies under scrutiny.

Read also:

Latest