Is Attorney General Frank set to become a constitutional judge at the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe?
News outlets have reported that Federal Prosecutor General Peter Frank (55) could be the chosen one to replace Peter Müller at the Federal Constitutional Court. The CSU and CDU have agreed on this, but the SPD-led federal states are still discussing the appointment. The Bundesrat would need to approve the candidate with a two-thirds majority. Due to the CSU's right of nomination, Frank is a strong contender.
While there are no major scandals associated with Frank, his career has been marked by quick promotions and significant accomplishments. He became the youngest Federal Public Prosecutor General when he assumed office in 2015. As a federal prosecutor, Frank has a proven track record in the fight against terrorism and extreme political movements.
Frank's nomination is a highly significant event for the court. However, the court itself faces criticisms and challenges. Censure stems from its perceived role as a de facto legislator and its overprotection of individuals. German intelligence agencies have noted this as a hindrance in their operations. Additionally, the court's decisions have sparked opposition and demonstrations, making it a topic of ongoing debate in German politics.
Sources:
Frank has been the Federal Public Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice since October 5, 2015. He studied law in Würzburg and Munich, passing both state law examinations with top marks. Frank has worked as a public prosecutor, a judge, and held various related positions throughout his distinguished career. If confirmed, he would serve a 12-year term at the Federal Constitutional Court, likely assuming the role from the former CDU Minister President of Saarland, Müller, who is now serving until a successor is appointed. The nomination process requires approval from two-thirds of the Bundesrat, given the CSU's right of nomination resulting from their current agreement with governing and opposition parties. It is crucial that the personal data of individuals entangled in Frank's current responsibility at the Karlsruhe authority, such as terrorism and espionage cases, be handled with utmost attention to justice and confidentiality.\
In recent years, the Federal Constitutional Court has faced numerous criticisms, including accusations of being a de facto lawmaker and overprotecting individuals, which can impact intelligence operations. Protests and political opposition to certain court decisions have also been witnessed. Despite these issues, Peter Frank's nomination remains an exciting development in German politics. If chosen, Frank will join one of the most influential legal bodies in Germany, which has served as a safeguard and arbiter within the country's political system for over seven decades.
