Whispered thoughts echo: "The quietness permeates"
In the city of Wuppertal, the landscape of electric scooters (E-scooters) is shaping up, yet the management of this micromobility service remains somewhat enigmatic. A closer look at the city's approach reveals a unique governance model that leans towards internal contractual controls rather than public reporting.
Firstly, it's worth noting that the city administration does not publicly announce the exact number of E-scooters each provider has on the road. This is primarily due to contractual and regulatory discretion, as evidenced by the recent exit of provider Dott from Wuppertal, which saw 400 scooters removed from the streets [1].
This lack of public announcement means the number of scooters per provider is likely controlled internally between the city and the providers. The reasons for this approach could include managing urban space, safety, or operational quality, without causing public concern or administrative complexity.
The implications for public transparency and regulation are significant. Reducing transparency limits residents’ and stakeholders' ability to monitor the scale and growth of these services independently. However, the city retains regulatory flexibility by managing scooter numbers through contracts without committing to fixed public quotas, allowing adjustments in response to usage, safety, and urban planning needs.
However, the absence of public data might lead to concerns about accountability or the adequacy of oversight if scooter fleets grow unexpectedly or cause issues like cluttering sidewalks.
Interestingly, there is no clear rule or regulation for E-scooter providers to adhere to in Wuppertal. This, coupled with the lack of enforcement of rules and fines for providers, does not seem to lead to increased acceptance. The city administration's communication policy on E-scooters has been criticised from the start, with some labelling it as "sit tight, don't react, to keep the discussion as small as possible."
Despite the fourth E-scooter provider starting operations in Wuppertal, this was not considered newsworthy by the city's press office. Furthermore, no information about the fourth provider can be found on the city's homepage, adding to the air of mystery surrounding the city's E-scooter governance.
For those concerned about the city's approach, there are avenues for expressing your views. You can submit a letter to the editor of the Rundschau by clicking here. Alternatively, you can send a letter to the editor of the website "unsere Webseite" at redaktion@unsere Webseite.
In conclusion, Wuppertal's approach to E-scooter management is characterised by a reliance on internal contractual controls rather than public reporting. While this approach offers some benefits in terms of regulatory flexibility, it raises questions about transparency and accountability. As the E-scooter landscape continues to evolve in Wuppertal, it will be interesting to see how the city addresses these concerns and shapes its future approach to this emerging mode of transport.
[1] Source: [Link to the original source]
Guidelines for publication can be found by clicking here.
