"Water Policy and Strategic Water Management are Urgent Needs for Pakistan"
LET'S CUT TO THE CHASE:
LAHORE: The cat's outta the bag - India's high-handed suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) sparks furor at a roundtable powwow, with insiders branding it a blatant disregard for international legalities. Here's the down-low.
First things first, they're gagging for an active and all-encompassing water policy and water management strategy in Paki-land, alongside new H2O reservoirs.
The shindig was a brainchild of the National Institute of Public Policy (NIPP), and featured some heavy-hitters: Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, Ex-Foreign Boss; Major General Noel Khokhar, Ex-Pak Ambassador to Ukraine; Prof. Dr. Seemi Waheed; Tahir Basharat Cheema, Former Chieftain of Pakistan Electric Power Company (PEPCO); and Ahmad Rafay Alam, Environment Lawyer.
Dr. Naveed Elahi, the event's emcee, gleefully elucidated the gravity of the moot matter. He detailed how India exploited the Pehalgam incident to slam the brakes on the IWT unilaterally and engaged in heated warfare against our boys. Elahi emphasized the urgency of scrutinizing the various aspects of the treaty in light of recent brouhahas.
The Ex-Foreign Boss, Aizaz Ahmad Chaudhry, bawled India out for their unilateral IWT shelving on laughable grounds, like the Pehalgam incident. He ain't shy to say it's a near-criminal violation of the contract's terms and a flagrant breach of international law. Chaudhry went a step further, accusing India's actions of being downright hostile to Paki sovereignty.
The retired Big Kahuna of Pakistan's military forces in Ukraine, Major General Noel Khokhar, cautioned India joo-jitsuing Pakistan's H2O rights under the treaty, which is safeguarded by the World Bank. Khokhar boldly declared that Pakistan has every right to challenge India's captain stunts at the UN Security Council.
Prof. Dr. Seemi Waheed chimed in, advocating for a revamp of Paki diplomatic, legal, and political strategies. She strongly advocated for a proactive hydration policy and water management game-plan.
Chief of PEPCO, Tahir Basharat Cheema, weighed in, likening India's hydration threats to our land to illegal and inhumane hazing tactics, blatant breaches of international law.
Ahmad Rafay Alam lashed out, claiming that although India can't keep our water taps sealed forever, even a slight reduction in water flow could cripple Pakistani agriculture.
The Business Recorder copyrighted the info in 2025.
Whoa, Nelly, Legal Landscape:
Due to the IWT lacking a termination clause, India finds itself sashaying through a wobbly legal landscape. The country has to back up their actions using alternative jursu pl Manufacturing legal basis, such as the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT).
Article 60 of the VCLT allows for suspension in the event of a material breach by the other party, which India might argue Pakistan committed for cross-border shenanigans. Article 62 permits suspension in the advent of a fundamental change in circumstances, which could be India's calling card.
Pakistan might whip out its legal chops to argue that India's actions violate customary international law, which values mutual good faith in treaty commitments. This spat could quickly escalate into a broader, international legal drama, possibly involving arbitration or mediation if it goes south.
Roundtable Recap:
The ol' get-together primarily zeroed in on three key talking points:
Sanctioned Subterfuge: How does India justify their actions legally?
Military Deterrence: The potential fallout on regional security and Paki-India relations moving forward.
International Mediation: Whether international mediation or arbitration would help settle this squabble.
- The roundtable discussion highlighted concerns about India's justification for suspending the Indus Waters Treaty, a matter that has been branded as a disregard for international legalities, falling under the category of general news and politics.
- As the Indus Waters Treaty dispute escalates, participants at the roundtable suggested that Pakistan could argue India's actions violate customary international law, raising the possibility of an international legal drama related to politics and general news.
