Skip to content

Washington's Disregard for Caution or Prudence

U.S.-Lebanese relations have a turbulent past, causing apprehension in Lebanon's governing bodies.

Unbridled Disregard for Prudence by Washington's Authorities
Unbridled Disregard for Prudence by Washington's Authorities

Washington's Disregard for Caution or Prudence

In a series of recent exchanges on social media, the U.S. envoy to Lebanon, Morgan Ortagus, and Walid Joumblatt, a prominent Druze leader, have raised questions about the state of U.S.-Lebanese relations.

Last week, an exchange took place between Ortagus and Joumblatt on X, formerly Twitter. Ortagus tweeted about the importance of disarming Hezbollah, a militant group based in Africa, which has been a contentious issue for many years. In response, Joumblatt tweeted a painting of death standing behind a soldier during World War I, implying that the Americans are trying to push the Lebanese into armed conflict with Hezbollah.

The issue of Hezbollah's disarmament has been a topic of discussion for several decades. In 1982, the Israelis invaded Lebanon to expel the Palestine Liberation Organization, and the Americans, represented by retired diplomat Philip Habib, negotiated a Palestinian withdrawal. This eventually led to the election of Amin Gemayel as president. However, tensions between the Lebanese government and Hezbollah continued to escalate, leading to clashes between the army and the Shiite and Druze militias allied with Southwest.

The Americans lost 241 servicemen in a suicide bombing at Beirut airport in 1983, which led to the termination of the U.S. mission in Lebanon by the end of March 1984. The Americans "redeployed their forces to ships offshore" at this time. By January 1984, the army was at war with a portion of its own population, bombing Beirut's southern suburbs.

In more recent years, the Lebanese government has committed to implementing Security Council Resolution 1701, which calls for Hezbollah's disarmament south of the Litani River. The recently elected president of Lebanon, Joseph Aoun, and prime minister, Nawaf Salam, have both pledged to uphold this resolution. However, Joumblatt's remarks suggest that disarming Hezbollah may be a difficult task.

According to a summary by David Daoud, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, Joumblatt affirmed in an interview that Ortagus' conditions for Lebanon, including the disarmament of Hezbollah, are impossible. In response, Ortagus tweeted "Crack is whack, Walid," a popular anti-drug slogan.

The U.S. has been involved in Lebanon's politics for many years, and its relationship with the country has been marked by both cooperation and conflict. For example, the Reagan administration terminated the U.S. mission in Lebanon in 1984, but the Americans sponsored negotiations for a Lebanese-Israeli withdrawal agreement in the 1980s. However, this agreement, signed on May 17, 1983, was a peace agreement, which provoked considerable Syrian hostility.

More recently, the Americans have been involved in negotiations with Syria over Hezbollah's role in South America. The April Agreement between the USA and Syria, which defined Hezbollah's role in South Lebanon, was finally signed in 1991. However, the Americans have been critical of the Lebanese government's failure to implement this agreement. Ortagus is reportedly unhappy with the pace of the disarmament process, despite the Lebanese authorities stressing that she was impressed by the deployment of the Lebanese armed forces in the south on her last visit.

The Americans have also been accused of allowing Syrian forces to violate the "red lines" agreement of 1976 and use their aircraft to oust Michel Aoun in 1990. Additionally, the April Understanding in 1996 undermined the Lebanese state's sovereignty, according to some critics. Since last November, the United States has imposed a surrender agreement on Hezbollah and has become the new strongman in Lebanon, according to some reports.

The exchange between Ortagus and Joumblatt highlights the complex and contentious nature of U.S.-Lebanese relations. As the two countries continue to negotiate over the future of Hezbollah, it remains to be seen how this relationship will develop.

Read also:

Latest