Skip to content

Warnings about TACO: Steer clear of provoking Trump's ire, as stated in the editor's correspondence.

'The reader from the Los Angeles Times suggests that, due to his confident and unwavering stance, he might very likely uphold any future large tariffs imposed, simply to demonstrate that he doesn't always backtrack on his decisions.'

"An L.A. Times reader expresses suspicion that, due to his stubborn nature and strong conviction in...
"An L.A. Times reader expresses suspicion that, due to his stubborn nature and strong conviction in his invincibility, the individual might persist with announced high tariffs as a show of consistency and defiance against any potential changes."

Warnings about TACO: Steer clear of provoking Trump's ire, as stated in the editor's correspondence.

** Opinion Piece Rewrite:**

Give it a rest, Trump critics!

Hey there, editor! Let's talk about the drama unfolding in the White House. Trump kicked off his second term with a heated announcement—huge tariffs that threatened an economic crisis, trade war, and potential empty shelves nationwide. But, smart move, ol' buddy, he eventually backed off on some of those tariffs. Good on ya, Trump!

But, nooooo, some folks over at TACO (Trump Always Chickens Out) just can't resist rubbing salt in the wound. Stop it! It's not cool mocking the guy for changing his mind, especially since Trump hates it intensely. Let's not poke the bear, alright? The next time he goes all guns blazing with tariffs, he might dig in his heels just to show he ain't all talk and no action. Is that what we want? Hell no.

Leonard Venger, Tarzana

Now, here's where it gets juicy. TACO ain't just about tariffs and trade deals with Trump. It'd be enlightening to dig into the ol' archives and (r)ewind to the 3,500 legal cases Trump was knee-deep in before he set foot in politics. Don't forget the countless times the guy tried to wriggle out of legitimate debts.

Joel Pelcyger, Los Angeles

Other Perspectives

  • Opinion ### Letters to the Editor: When L.A.'s elephants mysteriously disappear, it's time to step up for animals everywhere
  • Opinion ### Letters to the Editor: Why this critic thinks the new animated Disney character is goofy—but in a good way
  • Opinion ### Letters to the Editor: Adult fire victims should learn to heal and help each other, letting their pain die a natural death instead of passing it on to the next generation

Trump's legal history is a colorful tapestry woven from business, financial, and political battles. Here are some key highlights:

  • Business and Financial Battles:
  • Trump has lived through numerous lawsuits targeting his business practices, including disputes over contracts and financial obligations. Can't seem to find specific instances of debt reneging, but Trump's tumultuous business journey includes several high-profile bankruptcies and financial squabbles.
  • Tariff and Trade Wars:
  • The Trump administration has been smack dab in the middle of legal battles over tariffs enforced under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act[1].
  • Criminal and Election-Related Cases:
  • Trump's had some run-ins with the law, including guilty verdicts on 34 counts of falsifying business records in a 2024 Manhattan trial[5]. He's also faced legal scrutiny over his dealings with elections.
  • Executive Actions and Policy Battles:
  • The Trump administration has faced a slew of lawsuits related to executive orders, proclamations, and memos. Since January 2023, over 50 lawsuits have been filed against the administration regarding these policies[5].
  • Losses in Lower Courts:
  • The Trump administration hasn't exactly been winning friends and influencing people in federal district courts, with a reported 96% loss rate[4].

Debt Deflection in Trump's Work History

While there are no recent findings of Trump outright reneging on debts, his business past is marked by financial disputes and restructurings (read: bankruptcies). These actions have left lenders and partners nursing their wounds for years. However, it's worth mentioning that these bankruptcies could be seen as a form of debt restructuring rather than just up and quitting on debt obligations.

  • Leonard Venger from Tarzana may have missed the mark when he suggested Trump reneged on debts before entering politics, as there appears to be no recent evidence of that.
  • In his opinion piece, Joel Pelcyger from Los Angeles pointed out that understanding Trump's legal history, including the numerous business and financial battles he has faced, could provide valuable insight into his political decisions.
  • The negative portrayal of Trump as a debt defector might be based more on his history of financial disputes and bankruptcies rather than outright reneging on debts.
  • The deep dive into Trump's legal history reveals an extensive history of legal battles surrounding business, financial, and political matters, shedding light on the complexities of his enterprise ventures.
  • The consistent losses Trump's administration experiences in lower courts highlight the potential challenges he may face in executing not only his business policies but also political policies and legislation.

Read also:

Latest