Tradition Meets Modernity: The Cup in the Video Refereeing Dilemma - VAR Debate Intensifies in DFB Cup as Fairness Calls Clash with Cost Concerns
The use of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) in the DFB Cup has sparked debate, with calls for its earlier introduction to ensure fairness, despite concerns over costs and resources. Traditionalists argue that the Cup should embrace VAR sooner, with Bayern Munich's Max Eberl advocating for its use from the second round. However, the German Football Association (DFB) has been cautious, citing the high technical and financial costs that could burden lower-league clubs. Jochen Drees, head of innovation and technology at Refereeing GmbH, is open to the idea but notes personnel and infrastructure challenges.
Last season, Bundesliga clubs spent nearly €5 million on VAR technology. Despite this, the DFB insists on maintaining equal conditions for all teams, with no club gaining an advantage through different technical resources. Recent matches, such as those involving Borussia Dortmund and Eintracht Frankfurt, have seen VAR discussions and debates, but it has not been implemented throughout the entire Cup season.
Critics like Lukas Kwasniok, coach of 1. FC Köln, have slammed the lack of VAR in the second round, comparing it to driving without GPS. Notable errors, like the unpunished offside position of Luis Díaz in Köln's match against FC Bayern Munich, have further fuelled the debate. Ron-Robert Zieler, Köln's goalkeeper, believes referees have not yet learned to make decisions without VAR.
The VAR debate in the DFB Cup continues, with clubs and coaches pushing for earlier implementation, while the DFB and Refereeing GmbH grapple with costs and challenges. As the Cup progresses, the fairness and equality of the competition remain at the heart of the discussion.
