Skip to content

US lawyer Alex Acosta, responsible for Epstein's lenient plea bargain, testifies before the House Oversight Committee

Acosta Remains Silent Upon Entrance to Hearing Chamber, Avoiding Inquiries

US attorney alumnus Alex Acosta, responsible for brokering Epstein's lenient sentence, faces...
US attorney alumnus Alex Acosta, responsible for brokering Epstein's lenient sentence, faces questioning by the House Oversight Committee.

US lawyer Alex Acosta, responsible for Epstein's lenient plea bargain, testifies before the House Oversight Committee

In a recent development, Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, is testifying behind closed doors before the House Oversight Committee regarding his role in a 2008 plea deal with Jeffrey Epstein, the notorious financier and convicted sex offender.

The focus of the investigation revolves around a 2020 Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) report that examined the decisions made by Acosta and his top deputies in the course of negotiations with Epstein's lawyers. The report found that Acosta exercised "poor judgment" in making the deal with Epstein, but concluded that neither Acosta nor any of the prosecutors in his office had committed professional misconduct or violated any clear and unambiguous rules of the DOJ.

The OPR report also found that the meetings between Epstein's lawyers and the prosecution team did not result in any substantial benefit to the defense. However, it could not "rule out the possibility" that prosecutors may have been willing to meet with Epstein's lawyers because they knew them, given the reported relationships between high-level judiciary and prosecution figures in Miami and Epstein's lawyers, which allegedly involved connections established well before Epstein's 2009 conviction.

A. Marie Villafaña, the lead prosecutor, objected to the access that was being granted by the office to Epstein's defense counsel. She voiced her concerns to her supervisors about the meetings, but was overruled. Villafaña feared her office was "going down the same path" as the state of Florida in allowing Epstein's defense attorneys to persuade prosecutors not to file serious charges.

Villafaña believed Acosta was influenced by the stature of Epstein's attorneys and that the defense lawyers convinced some members of the prosecution team that the case was "extremely novel and legally complex." This belief was further supported by a lawsuit against the Justice Department that exposed much of the correspondence between Epstein's lawyers and prosecutors in advance of the negotiated plea.

The negotiations and resulting plea deal occurred while the FBI and Acosta's prosecutors were still investigating the case and identifying new victims in other jurisdictions. This raises questions about the timing and the potential influence of Epstein's lawyers during the negotiations.

The Epstein matter has received continued interest on Capitol Hill, and Acosta is being questioned about the investigation in Florida beginning in 2005 and the resulting non-prosecution agreement (NPA). The congressional committee's investigators are expected to press Acosta on his decision to enter into plea negotiations in the summer of 2007, while a 60-count draft federal indictment against Epstein was gathering dust.

The Trump administration is fully cooperating with the committee in this investigation. Acosta defended his decision to enter into plea negotiations with Epstein, stating his goal was to put Epstein behind bars. However, the committee's Epstein investigation is "very serious" and "fast moving," suggesting that Acosta's explanations may face further scrutiny.

The deal was signed before the FBI or prosecutors had made any concerted effort to gain the cooperation of Epstein's alleged co-conspirators. This raises concerns about the comprehensive nature of the investigation and the extent to which Epstein's associates may have been shielded by the plea deal.

The fallout from this investigation continues to unfold, with Acosta resigning from his position at the Labor Department in 2019, following public pressure over his role in the Epstein case. The ongoing investigation promises to shed more light on the circumstances surrounding the 2008 plea deal and its impact on the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein.

Read also:

Latest

Power outage hits Yakutsk and certain areas

Power supply disrupted in Yakutsk and certain areas

Power interruptions slated for Thursday, September 18, 2025, affecting Yakutsk and several nearby districts in the republic. Here's the work schedule: Yakutsk from 9:00 AM to 12:00 PM; Kirillov, 12th street, 14th street, Yaroslavsky street 27th, Arjakov street 16th, Ammosov street 3a-12, are...