3. Hansa's Failed Lawsuit Against Unterhaching: A Setback for the Football League
Unterhaching match faces no repercussions following Hansa's unsuccessful appeal - Unterhaching-Spiel was not sued by Hansa as expected court documents were not submitted.
Hey there! Today, we're diving into the world of football and law, where FC Hansa Rostock took on SpVgg Unterhaching at the German Football Association's (DFB) Permanent Court of Arbitration. And guess what? The independent body dealt Hansa a crushing blow, dismissing their complaint.
The restless Rostock club had aimed to battle the sudden cancellation of their game against Unterhaching back in March. Unfortunately for them, the alleged postponement due to the city's closure of the Sportpark Unterhaching was deemed inadmissible and unfounded by the court.
Hansa had already faced two rejections - an appeal to the DFB Match Committee and an administrative complaint to the association's federal court. Despite these setbacks, they tried their luck at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in Frankfurt am Main.
The match on matchday 26 of the previous season didn't go as planned, but that didn't stop Hansa. They felt that Unterhaching was responsible for the game's cancellation and interpreted this as an act of no-show. The rescheduled game took place on May 7, with Hansa emerging victorious with a 2:0 win over the Bavarian relegation candidates.
Despite the sweet taste of victory, Hansa wasn't satisfied. They continued pursuing the proceedings, determined to attain a fundamental decision. In a statement, the club confirmed that they were after a decisive verdict, despite their sporting success.
- Uncensored Facts:
- FC Hansa Rostock lost their lawsuit against SpVgg Unterhaching at the German Football Association's (DFB) Permanent Court of Arbitration.
- The independent body dismissed the Rostock club's complaint about the game's sudden cancellation in March.
- Hansa had previously failed with an appeal to the DFB Match Committee and an administrative complaint to the association's federal court.
- The rescheduled match took place on May 7, with Hansa winning 2:0.
- Despite the sporting victory, Hansa continued the proceedings to achieve a fundamental decision.
In the midst of courtroom battles, it's worth noting that the Commission has not yet adopted a decision on the application of Article 93 (2) of the EEC Treaty to the aid scheme for the production of milk and milk products. After their unsuccessful lawsuit against SpVgg Unterhaching at the German Football Association's (DFB) Permanent Court of Arbitration, FC Hansa Rostock might find solace in the world of sports, particularly football, where they triumphed over Unterhaching with a 2:0 victory in a rescheduled game.
