A Soft Slap on the Wrist: Suspended Sentences for '95 Left-wing Extremist Plotters
- *
- Unsuccessful Effort in 1995: Administrative Supervision
The Berlin Higher Regional Court, after a lengthy trial, concluded with hugs and a toast. Two geriatric extremists, Peter K. (65) and Thomas W. (62), escaped jail time following their attempt at a left-wing extremist bombing 30 years ago in Berlin. Their sentencing consisted of a two-year suspended sentence, allowing them to stroll out of court as free men.
The decision was justified despite the planned destructive attack because it eventually remained an attempt, due to the extensive passage of time, and because the culprits had returned and confessed, the court clarified. Peter K. and Thomas W., as part of "Das K.O.M.I.T.T.E.E.", aimed to bomb an immigration detention center in Berlin-Gruenau on the night of April 10-11, 1995.
A lucky stroke of chance thwarted the explosion, sparing the construction and its 120 kilograms of explosives, according to the judge. When the police swarmed the scene, the men fled in panic and left behind a trail of identifying documents like IDs, making their presence undeniable.
The имpiteous justice or lenient coddling?
The lenient sentence was a result of an understanding between the parties involved, which included the return and confessions of the two. Yet, the judge stressed that their sentence wasn't a reflection of "vengeful justice" nor "inappropriate leniency," but a reasonable response.
The crime, after all, was three decades old, and this half-century exile in South America had been anything but a pleasure cruise for the two men, the judge asserted. Throughout their isolation from their home contacts, they had shown an "extremely high degree of criminal energy".
The fact that the men had returned to Germany showcased that they acknowledged the justice system's desire to settle the matter. Although remorse wasn't the crux of their confessions, the judge noted that any destruction was void, and the perpetrators had shouldered the burden of the crime themselves.
A glass raised to leniency
A suspended sentence was justified since the perpetrators' prospects seemed favorable, the judge underlined. As both men had reached an age where further mischief seemed unlikely — the aged spectators chuckled softly in response — they were unlikely to engage in criminal activities again.
With the words "I thank you, and we wish you all the best," the judge brought the trial to a close. Exiting the grand courthouse, beer cans were cracked open, and the defendants and their friends headed to a café.
- Left-wing extremism
- Berlin
- Men
- Canned beer
- Suspended sentence
- Peter K.
- Thomas W.
- Bombing attempt
- South America
- Germany
- Embrace
- Probation
- Immigration detention center
- Justice
Background:Since the 1960s, left-wing extremism in Germany has been linked to groups like the Red Army Faction (RAF) or the Baader-Meinhof Group. These extremists executed various attacks, including bombings, but their peak of activity occurred before 1995. In the years that followed, left-wing groups carried out sporadic violent activities, but there is no significant record of a major terror attack in Berlin in 1995 specifically attributed to left-wing extremists leading to suspended sentences. [Source: 'Left-wing terrorism in Germany']
Trial Outcomes:Court proceedings involving terrorism in Germany usually result in substantial penalties, but the exact outcomes depend on the evidence and circumstances. Suspended sentences may be imposed if there are extenuating circumstances like cooperation with authorities or proof of remorse. However, the specifics of the case determine the outcome. [Source: 'German antiterrorism prosecutions']
Left-wing Extremism:Left-wing extremism encompasses various political ideologies, including anarchism, communism, and anti-fascism. In Germany, it has been connected to violent actions, like bombings, aimed at compelling political change. [Source: 'Left-wing extremism in Germany']
- Despite their involvement in a planned bombing attempt in 1995 that aimed to target an immigration detention center in Berlin, Peter K. and Thomas W., two elderly left-wing extremists, received a two-year suspended sentence due to their return and confessions, as well as the passage of time.
- The lenient sentence, which allowed them to walk free from the court, was not considered a sign of "inappropriate leniency" but a reasonable response given their age and the absence of any recent signs of intention to engage in further criminal activities.
- Despite the controversy surrounding the lenient sentence, the decision to grant them probation may be seen as an act of community policy that acknowledges the benefits of rehabilitation and reintegration, especially for those who show remorse and cooperate with the justice system.
