Dive into The Sun's Opinion Pieces
Unnecessary Troops in Los Angeles: U.S. Military Deployment Under Scrutiny
With endless content to digest, let's take a look at the juicy bits:
- Editorials - The Sun's take
- Get insight on our viewpoints
- Columnists - Local and syndicated voices
- Hear from varying perspectives
- Letters to the editor - Reader voices
- Share your take on the issues
- Write a letter to the editor
- Make your voice heard on the topics that matter
Last week, the White House made a bold move, sending National Guard troops to Los Angeles to intervene in anti-ICE protests. California's Gov. Gavin Newsom and LA Mayor Karen Bass vehemently opposed this decision, but President Trump went ahead, overriding their objections.
Long-time Republican and LA mayoral hopeful Rick Caruso, who lost to Karen Bass, remarked that there was no emergency, no need for National Guard intervention or any federal force, and that local law enforcement was more than capable of handling the situation. He warned that deploying the National Guard might fan the flames of unrest rather than quell them.
As expected, Caruso's predictions proved valid, as unrest escalated, culminating in 42 arrests on Sunday. Trump trumpeted his success in preventing LA from being "completely obliterated," while the number of troops in the city surged. Trump has successfully crafted the dramatic spectacle he so eagerly desired.
It's worth noting that in October 2020, 76 arrests were made after LA Lakers fans rioted following a championship win, and Trump's reaction was quite different. He stated, "We have laws. We have to go by the laws. We can’t move in the National Guard. We can’t call in the National Guard unless we’re requested by a governor." Yet, the circumstances seem murkier today. What's transformed Trump's stance?
The facts at hand show a prolonged power struggle between Trump and California officials over the National Guard's deployment in LA amid controversial protests.
Initially, Trump ordered around 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the Los Angeles area, shifting them under federal control, circumventing state authority, and sparking a legal battle.
Governor Newsom hastily filed a lawsuit, asserting that Trump's decision was unconstitutional and a violation of constitutional limits. He requested a TRO to return control of the Guard to the state, but a federal district judge sided with Newsom, labeling Trump's actions "illegal" and ordering the Guard's control reverted to the governor. Still, the Trump administration continued to contest the decision.
Subsequently, the Pentagon deployed an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to the LA area, increasing the federal force to about 6,100 National Guardsmen plus Marines. Despite ongoing judicial deliberations, Trump has stubbornly maintained and expanded the National Guard deployment, asserting constitutional authority as commander in chief.
In conclusion, Trump has persisted in and expanded the federal deployment of National Guard troops to LA, while state officials and courts argue against this move as an overreach of presidential power and a violation of state sovereignty.
The current news revolves around a significant policy-and-legislation topic in politics, as the deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles has sparked a heated power struggle between President Trump and California officials, including Governor Gavin Newsom. This development is a general-news item worthy of deep discussion, and reading letters to the editor or writing one might provide insightful perspectives on this controversial issue.
