American Veto Squashes UN Ceasefire and Aid Resolution for Gaza
United States vetoes resolution proposing truce in Gaza, along with humanitarian aid
Socialize | Retweet | Message | Mail | Print | Link---------|---------|---------|------|-------|-------Get the gist on how the U.S. justification behind blocking a crucial UN Security Council resolution plea for a lasting truce in Gaza on June 4, 2025.
The Background:The American authorities thwarted a UN Security Council resolution that proposed an instant, sustainable, and all-inclusive ceasefire in Gaza, insisted upon by all combatants. The proposal also urged for the immediate and unrestricted delivery of humanitarian aid to the distressed Gaza Strip. Amazingly, all other 14 member states of the Security Council agreed with this resolution.
In a statement before the vote, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea, expressed her concerns. "This proposal would sabotage diplomatic attempts to form a ceasefire that aligns with on-ground realities and would overwhelm Hamas. It also establishes an unjust comparison between Israel and Hamas," Shea argued.
Source: ntv.de, AFP
The Enrichment:The U.S. decision to block the UN Security Council resolution primarily stemmed from the document's failure to condemn Hamas, reject its arms, and vacate Gaza. Moreover, the resolution was perceived as undermining U.S. negotiations aimed at a ceasefire that reflects the ground realities[2][3][4]. Dorothy Shea maintained that the resolution falsely equates Israel with Hamas and would encourage Hamas's inflexibility, particularly in light of Hamas's rejection of past ceasefire deals[3][4].
The global community expressed solidarity with the resolution, with 14 out of 15 Security Council members voting in favor. This shows a stark contrast in views between the U.S. and the international community on the matter[3][5]. In response, a similar resolution is reported to be presented before the UN General Assembly, where nations lack veto power, making it likely to pass[5].
Ambassador Shea reiterated that the U.S. stance hinged on a resolution that acknowledged Hamas's misdeeds and demanded its disarmament and retreat from Gaza. She also emphasized that Hamas instigated the conflict and poses a continuous danger to both Israelis and Palestinians by employing civilians as human shields[4].
- The American veto of the UN Security Council resolution to instigate a ceasefire in Gaza and provide aid was based on its failure to condemn Hamas, disarm them, and evacuate Gaza, disagreeing with the international community's perspective on the matter.
- The ongoing politics surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, involving war-and-conflicts, has resulted in the employment policy of using civilians as human shields being questioned, especially regarding Hamas's role in the escalations, as highlighted by U.S. Ambassador Dorothy Shea.
