U.S. Veto Stops UN Security Council Resolution on Ceasefire and Aid for Gaza
United States Vetoes Ceasefire Resolution and Humanitarian Aid for Gaza
Discuss Share Forward Email Print Copy Link
In a surprising turn of events at the UN Security Council on Wednesday, the U.S. thwarted a resolution calling for an immediate truce and unhindered relief supplies for Gaza's war-torn populace. Despite the resolution receiving unanimous backing from the other 14 council members, the U.S. once again stood alone, making no apologies for its decision.
"Passing this resolution would sidestep diplomatic efforts to hammer out a truce fitting the ground realities, and it'd give Hamas a much-needed boost," warned U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, Dorothy Shea, ahead of the vote. "This resolution also incorrectly equates Israel and Hamas."
The draft resolution put forward a strong plea for an "immediate, unconditional, and enduring ceasefire in Gaza, to be honored by all parties," in addition to demanding the prompt and unconditional release of all hostages under Hamas's control. Given the critical humanitarian situation in the coastal region, the resolution also urged the removal of restrictions impacting Gaza's influx of aid.
Additional Information:
- The most recent and relevant veto took place on June 4, 2025, when the U.S. opposed a UN Security Council resolution aiming for an immediate ceasefire and humanitarian aid for Gaza.
- The U.S. argued that the resolution fell short by failing to demand Hamas disarm, explicitly condemn Hamas for its role in the on-going conflict, and hold Hamas accountable for its security concerns.
- The U.S. maintained that the resolution could weaken Israel's security by not punishing Hamas and creating a distorted moral equivalence between Israel and Hamas, potentially allowing future assaults like the October 7, 2023 attack to recur.
- Humanitarian organizations such as Amnesty International criticized the veto as heartless and accused it of giving Israel carte blanche to intensify military actions, worsening the ongoing humanitarian crisis.
The U.S.'s stance, in the words of Ambassador Dorothy Shea, emphasizes the importance of focusing directly on Hamas's actions and ensuring Israel's security rather than supporting a resolution that doesn't directly address Hamas's role in the conflict.
- The U.S.'s employment policy in the UN Security Council includes a firm stance against resolutions that do not directly address Hamas's role in conflicts, as demonstrated by its veto of a resolution aimed at ceasefire and aid for Gaza's populace in 2025.
- The community policy within the U.S. government relates to the critiques made by Ambassador Dorothy Shea against UN resolutions that equate Israel and Hamas, as she believes such resolutions undermine diplomatic efforts to achieve ground reality-based truces and inadvertently boost Hamas.
