Skip to content

United States imposes financial penalties on judges serving at the International Criminal Tribunal of The Hague

U.S. Secretary of State Rubio alleges unlawful conduct by four judges at the International Criminal Court, two of whom examined disputed Israeli war crime allegations.

U.S. Secretary of State Rubio labels actions of four International Criminal Court judges as...
U.S. Secretary of State Rubio labels actions of four International Criminal Court judges as 'unlawful,' with two having examined potential Israeli war crime allegations.

United States imposes financial penalties on judges serving at the International Criminal Tribunal of The Hague

No-Nonsense take on the U.S. Sanctions against ICC Judges

The United States has given the middle finger to the International Criminal Court (ICC) by slapping sanctions on four judges based in The Hague. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio went ballistic, warning the ICC to put an end to their BS investigations against the U.S. and Israel pronto.

Back in February, President Donnie Trump lit the way for these punitive measures with an executive order. He claims the ICC is a power-hungry bully that's been fishing for dirt on the U.S. and Israel. Two judges allegedly meddled in investigations regarding Israel's skirmishes with the radical Islamic group Hamas in the Gaza Strip. The other two had their hands deep in an investigation into U.S. troops' actions in Afghanistan.

The U.S. administration accuses these judges of being puppets in the ICC's shady schemes against America and Israel. Marco Rubio was none too pleased, slamming the ICC for its political agenda and bogus claims to free reign in probing, charging, or prosecuting U.S. and allied officials.

Specifically, the U.S. government lays the blame on two judges for greenlighting an investigation targeting U.S. soldiers in Afghanistan. They also point a finger at the other two for facilitating arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and ex-Defense Minister Joaw Galant in connection with the Gaza fiasco.

Freezing the Judges' Assets

The four judges hail from Benin, Peru, Slovenia, and Uganda. With the sanctions, any dough they’ve got stashed in the U.S. is now on ice. U.S. corporations and citizens are also barred from dealing with them. No travel ban was issued.

The ICC has been chasing down the worst of the worst, including genocide, war crimes, and humanitarian crimes, since 2002. All European Union member states are part of the club. But the U.S., Israel, and Russia are defiant outsiders who don't recognize the ICC as a legitimate authority.

Trump sniffed out the ICC’s snooping ways during his first term as president when it looked into alleged war crimes by U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Joe Biden later rolled back those sanctions after taking office.

[Enrichment Data]: The U.S. sanctions are part of a larger power struggle between the U.S. and the ICC, which has sparked tensions over jurisdiction and the court's authority to investigate crimes involving U.S. or Israeli citizens. The ICC sees these sanctions as a direct attack on its independence and authority.

  1. The U.S. sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) judges, as part of a power struggle, have escalated tensions over jurisdiction and the court's authority, particularly in investigations involving U.S. or Israeli citizens.
  2. The sanctions, following an executive order by President Donnie Trump, target four judges who are accused of being puppets in the ICC's political agenda, with two judges allegedly interfering in investigations regarding Israel and the other two implicated in an investigation involving U.S. troops.
  3. The policy-and-legislation move by the U.S. administration to freeze the assets of these ICC judges and restrict U.S. corporations and citizens from dealing with them is a reminder of the ongoing war-and-conflicts-related general-news coverage and the complex crime-and-justice implications that continue to unfold.

Read also:

Latest