Skip to content

United States criticizes Europe in abridged human rights report concerning free speech

Human Rights Deteriorating in Western Europe Due to Internet Regulations, U.S. Claims in Abbreviated Yearly Report, Leaving Allies of President Donald Trump Unscathed

United States Criticizes Europe over Freedom of Speech in Streamlined Human Rights Report
United States Criticizes Europe over Freedom of Speech in Streamlined Human Rights Report

United States criticizes Europe in abridged human rights report concerning free speech

The U.S. State Department's 2025 Human Rights Report has been met with criticism for its alleged politicisation and omission of key categories of rights violations. The report, released under Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has been accused of focusing on countries in Trump's crosshairs, such as Brazil and South Africa, while trimming sections on other regions, including Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza.

The report acknowledges cases of arbitrary arrests and killings by Israel but states that authorities have taken "credible steps" to identify those responsible. However, critics argue that the report's reduced focus on Israel is a reflection of the administration's political agenda. Similarly, the report states that human rights have worsened in Britain, France, and Germany due to restrictions on online hate speech, but British officials have been accused of repeatedly intervening to chill speech.

The report also faces criticism for papering over abuses by allied governments. Nations like Britain, Uganda, El Salvador, Brazil, and South Africa reportedly had their rights issues either understated or omitted, as the administration toned down criticisms to preserve political relations. This has led to concerns that the report sends a "chilling message" that the United States will overlook abuses if doing so suits its political agenda.

Amnesty International USA's Amanda Klasing echoes this sentiment, stating that the report effectively whitewashes serious abuses, undermining its credibility and risking weakening protections for human rights defenders and asylum seekers globally. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce, however, defends the report, stating that online restrictions have targeted "disfavoured voices on political or religious grounds."

In El Salvador, President Nayib Bukele's sweeping crackdown on crime has been a point of contention. Rights groups claim that many innocent people have been put in detention, while the report notes a "historic low" in crime. Meanwhile, in Brazil, the report states that rights have significantly worsened in 2024, with President Jair Bolsonaro, an ally of Trump, accused of a coup attempt.

The controversy surrounding the 2025 report extends to other regions as well. The report accuses China of ongoing genocide against the Uyghur people, a mostly Muslim group, but it has been criticised for omitting key categories of rights violations, such as those affecting women, LGBT people, persons with disabilities, government corruption, and freedom of peaceful assembly.

A group of former State Department officials have also criticised the report for its omissions, with some considering the exclusion of LGBTQ rights in Uganda as shocking. The politicisation of the report has raised concerns about its impact on human rights defenders and asylum seekers around the world.

[1] Human Rights Watch, "U.S. State Department's 2025 Human Rights Report Criticised for Political Bias and Omissions" [3] Amnesty International, "U.S. State Department's 2025 Human Rights Report: A Politically Influenced Document"

  1. The U.S. State Department's 2025 Human Rights Report has been criticized for its alleged politicization and omission of key categories of rights violations.
  2. The report has been accused of focusing on countries in political crosshairs while trimming sections on other regions, leading to concerns that it sends a "chilling message" about the United States' stance on human rights.
  3. Nations like Britain, Uganda, El Salvador, Brazil, and South Africa reportedly had their rights issues either understated or omitted in the report, causing worries about ignoring abuse if it suits political agenda.
  4. The controversy extends to other regions, with China being accused of ongoing genocide against the Uyghur people, but the report is criticized for omitting categories of rights violations, such as those affecting women, LGBT people, persons with disabilities, government corruption, and freedom of peaceful assembly.
  5. The politicization of the report has raised concerns about its impact on human rights defenders and asylum seekers around the world.
  6. In El Salvador, the government's crackdown on crime has caused controversy, with rights groups claiming that many innocent people have been put in detention, while the report notes a "historic low" in crime.
  7. The report has been criticized by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and a group of former State Department officials for its omissions, with some considering the exclusion of LGBTQ rights in Uganda as shocking.

Read also:

    Latest