Skip to content

Unauthorized use of waterslides now requires safety measures to be in place, as mandated by the court.

Slides designed for water play should maintain safety standards amidst potential misuse by unauthorized individuals.

Slippery plunge: enjoyable amusement park attraction allowing thrill-seekers to glide down a steep,...
Slippery plunge: enjoyable amusement park attraction allowing thrill-seekers to glide down a steep, slippery slope.

Water Slides Must Adhere to Safety Standards, Even in Unauthorized Use, Court Rules

Unauthorized usage of water slides should ensure safety, as per the recent decree. - Unauthorized use of waterslides now requires safety measures to be in place, as mandated by the court.

Hey there! Let's dive right into the latest news about water slides and safety regulations.

A 37-year-old man took a dip in a legal battle with the manufacturer of a water slide, the pool's operator, and the water slide's inspectors. The cause of the dispute? A wild ride that led to him being paralyzed. Yikes!

The man had paid for a rousing water slide experience at a pool, but instead of going down like a pro, he decided to get a little creative and slid down head-first, prone position. After reaching the end of the thrilling ride, he didn't stop sliding and dashed straight into the pool's edge, resulting in some serious harm.

The Regional Court in Oldenburg initially dismissed the man's lawsuit of 335,000 euros in damages and compensation, pointing out warning signs that clearly stated against sliding headfirst in such a position. The court argued that water slides don't have to guarantee zero danger when used improperly. The man appealed the decision.

The Higher Regional Court stepped in, siding with our adventure-seeking friend. The court ruled that the pool operator and the water slide manufacturer were liable for his injuries, albeit partially. The man will bear 50% of the responsibility for ignoring the warning signs, while the pool operator and the manufacturer must share the other 60%.

But here's the kicker - the Higher Regional Court believes water slides should be designed to minimize risks even in scenarios where they're likely to be misused, like in swimming pools. The court argued that as a user of a swimming pool, one could expect that a collision with the opposite pool wall would be avoided. The initial design phase of the slide should have accounted for a larger safety buffer between the pool edge and the end of the slide.

The verdict was handed down on March 26, and the defendants have since filed a non-appeal application with the Federal Court of Justice.

So, next time you're ready to conquer a water slide, remember: safety first, always!

  • Keywords: Water Slide, Oldenburg, OLG
  • Additional Insights: German courts do not have specific rules about water slide safety in instances of unauthorized use, as per current search results. To gather more insights on German legal decisions related to recreational facilities and unauthorized use, consult legal resources, German case law, or seek advice from a German law expert.

The Commission, following the ruling in Oldenburg by the Higher Regional Court (OLG), might revisit the application of safety standards in water slides, taking into account the need for slides to minimize risks even in unauthorized use scenarios. In the realm of sports-analysis, we could draw a parallel with the concept of 'risk-mitigation' strategies, encouraging manufacturers to design safer equipment that can withstand misuse.

Read also:

Latest