UK Resident Polish National Averted Last-Minute Deportation

The Skinny on Mateusz Kulik's Deportation Fiasco

Hey there,

Strap in, folks, as we dive into the turbulent tale of Mateusz Kulik, a Polish-born man who's been living in the UK since he was a babe of seven. As luck would have it, Mateusz got a stay of execution from the UK's immigration authorities, who yanked back his planned removal to Poland.

Mateusz, saucy at 27, got into hot water due to hiccups with his application for the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS). Despite shoveling in a mountain of documents, showing he'd been rooted in the UK for a decent chunk of his life, the Home Office thumbed its nose at him, giving his in-time application the boot in January 2021. And he didn't get a heads up until a year later!

Our man Mateusz is an overachiever, having completed schooling in Blighty and nabbing himself a gig with a UK transport company, where he juggles customs docs for EU exports. Despite his bells and whistles UK ties—including his folks, approved under the EUSS—the Home Office called shenanigans on his application in 2021.

Booted, bewildered, and baffled, Mateusz requested an administrative review, making it read factor 100 on his bingo card of bureaucratic encounters. Finally, they wrapped it up last month. But does it surprise you that the review upheld the refusal? This left ol' Mateusz immersed in the muck of uncertainty.

As if that wasn't enough to ground his vacation, Kulik landed back in Blighty from a cruise in Thailand and was Limey TF out of there. He found himself locked in vises at Heathrow for eight hours. As he puts it, "I was devastated to be held for eight hours in a room at Heathrow airport like some sort of felon."

With his deportation scheduled for Monday, Mateusz's lawyer, Andrew Jordan, from the charity Settled, which supports EU citizens, sprang into action, submitting a speedy new application for EUSS and urging Home Office officials to hit the brakes on the removal. At first, they held firm, with removal proceedings full steam ahead. But on Sunday afternoon, the Home Office emailed Jordan a surprise email, announcing that the removal had been canceled! Huzzah!

Andrew Jordan, ever the royal barrister, expressed serious relief at the decision. He said, "We were deeply concerned that they would press ahead with his removal and not wait a few days for another department to issue the necessary certificate of application." He added that the Home Office's systems showed unmitigated proof that Mateusz had been living in the UK since 2004, when he arrived as a seven-year-old.

Now Mateusz watches and waits for news about his immigration status, keeping his fingers crossed for reasonable resolution. Yep, he's got sunshine on cloud nine vibes, but who can blame the boy?

As for the Home Office, they're notoriously tight-lipped about individual immigration matters. An anonymous spokesdude would only give a non-committal nod to their love of bureaucratic puzzles.

Mateusz's case ain't just a blip on the radar—it's a symptom of ongoing challenges faced by long-term EU residents in the UK post-Brexit, particularly those with complex or delayed applications to the EUSS. The situation reflects widespread concerns about the treatment of EU citizens who are struggling to secure their status following Britain's exit from the European Union.

Wanna keep up with what's happening in Poland? Sign up below to get a weekly recap of News from Poland delivered to your email!

substack_form_poland

Enrichment Data:1. Mateusz Kulik's case is emblematic of ongoing challenges faced by long-term EU residents in the UK post-Brexit regarding the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS).2. Challenges escalated after stricter rules introduced in August 2023, such as: - Stringent late application requirements (30 June 2021 deadline). - Loss of appeal/review rights, leaving applicants with no recourse but judicial review or fresh applications. - Complex family member cases, requiring lengthy documentation. - Evidentiary burdens, necessitating continuous UK residence proofs. - Legal uncertainty due to shifts from refusal to rejection for late applications, leaving status rights in limbo during appeals.

The recent developments in Mateusz Kulik's case serve as a representative example of the ongoing difficulties experienced by long-term EU residents in the UK post-Brexit, specifically in their applications to the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS).
In August 2023, new, stricter rules were implemented, leading to increased challenges such as stringent late application requirements, loss of appeal and review rights, complex family member cases, elevated evidentiary burdens, and legal uncertainty during appeals.
The AI implementation in managing these applications has sparked debates in the general-news and political circles, with calls for improved transparency and fairness in the decision-making process.
A key concern is the potential impact on the UK's economy and immigration law, which could lead to a brain drain of skilled European workers and contribute to legal disputes.
The unfolding story of Mateusz Kulik is closely linked to the broader Brexit consequences, shedding light on the need for a fair and efficient system to manage EU immigration and residency in the post-Brexit landscape.
As tensions rise in the English legal system, experts in law and AI have called for an overhaul of the current system, advocating for a more equitable and efficient process to protect the rights of EU citizens residing in the UK.