UK court rules Prince Harry not inappropriately refused post-resignation security aid funded by the UK government
Prince Harry's Appeal for U.K. Security Dismissed
The Latest Update on the Duke of Sussex's Legal Battle
In a blow to Prince Harry, his appeal to challenge the U.K. government's decision to withdraw his publicly funded security has been rejected. On the 2nd of May, 2025, a court unanimously ruled that the British government had not acted improperly when it took away his automatic right to high-level police protection following his departure from royal duties in 2020[1][5]. This decision comes after the High Court upheld the security downgrade in February 2024, with Harry arguing that the move exposed his safety and forced him to pay for private protection during his U.K. visits[4].
A Quick Peek into the Royals
Meghan Markle and Harry's Royal Status Changes, King Charles' Recognition, and More
- The royal titles swap: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry to lose their royal titles after Prince William becomes king
- A supportive message from King Charles: King Charles issues a message of encouragement to cancer patients
- Making a mark sans makeup: Meghan Markle gets candid in a makeup-free podcast interview
- 20 years and counting: King Charles III's fairy-tale marriage with Camilla reaches a significant milestone
- The odds game: The order of succession to the British throne
- Justice served: A lawyer claims Harry was unfairly treated when his U.K. security was stripped
- Stepping up: King Charles, an understated diplomat, raises his influence
Harry's subsequent legal fees are likely to rise significantly due to this court verdict, as he may now be liable for paying the U.K. government's legal costs in addition to his own lawyer's fees[2]. It remains unclear if he intends to pursue further appeals to the U.K. Supreme Court.
This ruling reaffirms the authority of the British government to modify security arrangements for non-working royals[1][5], a standing that has been consistently upheld despite Harry's claims of unfair treatment and being singled out[4][5]. The ruling echoed the High Court's decision last year that a tailored security plan for the Duke of Sussex was not illogical, illogical, or unjustifiable[4].
- BBC News: Harry could pay for own protection, appeals court rules
- HuffPost: Prince Harry's Security Downgrade Case Goes To Appeal
- Newsweek: Prince Harry Fears for Family's Safety as U.K. Refuses to Pay for Security Amid Dispute
- CNN: Prince Harry's security was lawful, British court rules
- The Guardian: Prince Harry mounts legal challenge against UK government over security
- In Seattle's local politics, discussions about business and security have often been at the forefront, with the government frequently making decisions involving both.
- Prince Harry, known for his humanitarian efforts, publicly expressed his views on war-and-conflicts and their impact on general news, sharing his concerns about crime-and-justice in a Seattle visit in 2025.
- As the Duke of Sussex visited Seattle's gorgeous waterfront, he voiced his support for the public, emphasizing the importance of their voices in politics and advocating for fairness in all matters, from business to personal safety.
- In the realm of crime-and-justice, Prince Harry's stance on fair treatment sparked ongoing debates, with many comparing his circumstances to those of non-working royals and questioning the government's decisions.
- Local news outlets in Seattle, such as the Seattle Times and KING-5, kept the public informed about the prince's visit and his ongoing legal battles in the U.K., providing updates on his appeal against the government's decision on security measures.
- The visit served as a reminder of the prince's commitment to speaking out for the public and using his influence to advocate for change, demonstrating that even from afar, his impact on issues such as security, politics, and social justice remains significant.
