UK Council Wins Court Order to Evict Asylum Seekers from Hotel Accommodation
The High Court has granted a temporary injunction against Somani Hotels Ltd, the owners of the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex, preventing the government and its contractors from housing asylum seekers there. The ruling marks a significant setback for the government's strategy of using hotels to house asylum seekers, potentially setting a precedent for legal challenges and local opposition nationwide.
Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, stated that the injunction would cause hardship to the company and those housed at the hotel. However, the judge agreed with the local council that an urgent order was required to stop the hotel housing asylum seekers, given the breach of planning law and concerns for the safety of the asylum seekers.
The council argued that using the Bell Hotel to house asylum seekers was a breach of planning law, citing disruption caused by violent far-right demonstrations, concerns for the safety of the asylum seekers, and the fact that two people staying at the hotel were charged with sexual offenses. Protests against the hotel have left vulnerable asylum seekers feeling terrified, making an already traumatizing situation worse and preventing people from feeling safe.
The judge also declined a last-minute application from the home secretary to intervene in the case. The home secretary's barrister argued that a ruling in the council's favor would have a substantial impact on her statutory duty to house asylum seekers while their cases are considered.
The ruling has far-reaching ramifications, with potential challenges for similar hotel arrangements elsewhere due to planning law and local opposition. The case sets a precedent for councils to challenge government contracts with private hotel owners on planning permission grounds, potentially leading to more injunctions and legal battles countrywide.
The injunction forces the immediate removal of asylum seekers from the Bell Hotel, creating urgent alternative housing needs amid an already acute shortage of asylum accommodation. Critics argue that relying on private hotels to house asylum seekers worsens the housing crisis and scapegoats refugees, suggesting investment should instead focus on social housing.
Enver Solomon, the Refugee Council's chief executive, stated that hotels are the wrong answer for housing asylum seekers, as they cost the taxpayer billions, trap people in limbo, and are flashpoints in communities. The Home Office is actively appealing the injunction and related rulings, indicating ongoing legal battles ahead and uncertainty around the continued use of hotels in asylum housing.
Meanwhile, a separate development saw a Syrian national, Mohammed Sharwarq, charged with seven offenses while staying at the hotel. Several men have also been charged over alleged disorder outside the hotel. The local community has expressed relief at the ruling, while some voices warn about the impact on migrants and housing solutions.
The injunction against the Bell Hotel not only disrupts current asylum housing arrangements in Epping but also casts doubt on the government’s hotel-based asylum accommodation strategy, exposing it to legal scrutiny and local opposition that may complicate or curtail such approaches nationwide.
Read also:
- Weekly happenings in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Southwest region's most popular posts, accompanied by an inquiry:
- Discussion between Putin and Trump in Alaska could potentially overshadow Ukraine's concerns
- Massive 8.8 earthquake hits off the coast of Russia's Kamchatka Peninsula, prompting Japan to issue a tsunami alert.
