Skip to content

U.S. vetoes ceasefire resolution and humanitarian aid for Gaza Strip

Security Council Member's Power of Veto Blocks Resolution

United States Vetoes Resolution Calling for Ceasefire and Humanitarian Aid to Gaza
United States Vetoes Resolution Calling for Ceasefire and Humanitarian Aid to Gaza

United States Nixes UN Ceasefire and Aid Delivery Resolution for Gaza: 2025 Edition

U.S. vetoes ceasefire resolution and humanitarian aid for Gaza Strip

Hit the brakes! In 2025, the United States made a bold move by vetoing a UN Security Council resolution pleading for an immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire across Gaza, and the immediate release of all individuals being held captive by Hamas and other factions. The resolution also requested the removal of all limitations on the transportation of life-saving aid to the coastal strip[1][2][3].

Ambassador Dorothy Shea, the US envoy to the UN, emphasized before the vote, "This resolution would destabilize our diplomatic efforts to establish a ceasefire that aligns with the existing conditions and would bolster Hamas. This resolution also wrongfully equates Israel and Hamas, ignoring Hamas's accountability in the conflict[1]."

Sources: ntv.de, AFP

Note: The information presented does not relate to a U.S. veto of a UN Security Council Resolution for a ceasefire and aid delivery to Gaza in 2021. In 2021, specific details regarding a US veto on this subject are lacking in our search results. If such an event occurred, similar rationales focusing on preserving diplomatic leverage and Israel's safety concerns could have been applied, given the general context provided in 2025.

  1. The community policy of the United States in 2025 appeared to prioritize diplomatic negotiations, with Ambassador Dorothy Shea rejecting the UN resolution due to concerns that it would destabilize their ceasefire efforts and bolster Hamas.
  2. A review of general news and politics in 2025 revealed that the United States, amidst war-and-conflicts, vetoed a UN resolution aiming to secure a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, citing potential conflicts with their employment policy and the need to maintain a balanced approach towards all parties involved.

Read also:

Latest