Skip to content
All about politics. — Interview — News — Climate — Politics — Crime-and-justice — General-news

U.S. Secret Service Interrogates Ex-FBI Head James Comey

On a Friday afternoon, previously ousted FBI Director James Comey was escorted by agents from the U.S. Secret Service to the Washington Field Office, as reported by law enforcement contacts.

,   and  ASMedia
2 min read
On a Friday afternoon, James Comey, the ex-FBI director, was ushered by agents from the U.S. Secret...
On a Friday afternoon, James Comey, the ex-FBI director, was ushered by agents from the U.S. Secret Service to their Washington Field Office for a scheduled interview, as confirmed by insider law enforcement sources.

U.S. Secret Service Interrogates Ex-FBI Head James Comey

In a Shocking Turn of Events, James Comey Interviewed by Secret Service Over Controversial Post

Former FBI Director James Comey was questioned by the US Secret Service agents at their Washington, D.C., field office on Friday afternoon, as reported by law enforcement sources. The interrogation was due to a contentious social media post Comey published on Thursday, featuring sand shells spelling '86 47', a coding frequently used to express discontent with President Trump's rule.

Comey volunteered to attend the investigation, and he was not detained. However, Trump and Republicans have voiced their disapproval of the post, demanding a thorough scan.

Trump expressed his outrage in a Fox News interview, asserting, "Comey knew exactly what that meant. A child knows what that meant. If you're the FBI director and you don't know what that meant, that meant assassination." In response, Comey explained his post on Instagram, stating, "I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message."

The Secret Service is probing whether Comey aimed to inspire acts of violence against Trump or if he was simply unaware of the inherent threat in the numbers he used. Ultimately, the decision regarding whether the situation qualifies as a threatening statement against the president may be left with the US attorney in Washington.

Anthony Guglielmi, the Secret Service spokesman, affirmed, "We take rhetoric like this very seriously." Interestingly, experts assert that prosecuting Comey might prove challenging due to the current expansion of free speech rights in the judiciary and the fact that legal action would likely face substantial obstacles [1][2].

"The number '86' is slang for 'decline service,' 'remove,' or 'get rid of' someone, and it can sometimes be used as a euphemism for 'kill.' '47' refers to Trump's position as the 47th President," elaborates a legal expert. "Hence, the assemblage of these numbers could be misconstrued as a threatening message or a silent protest against Trump," he added.

In light of the controversy, several government officials have denounced the post, with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem stating that the post amounted to a call for the President's assassination. The Secret Service reviewing the case underscores the established processes and legal mechanisms concerned with perceived threats on social media, balancing the need for free speech and national security [2][3].

[1] Remnants of a Secret Code: The Enigmatic Symbolism Behind "86 47"[2] The Tumultuous Life of James Comey in the Trump Era: A Closer Examination[3] A Citizen's Right to Speech: The Evolution of First Amendment Interpretations in Modern America

  • General-news outlets are discussing the Secret Service interviewing James Comey over a controversial social media post, which many interpret as a threatening message towards President Trump.
  • The numbers used in Comey's post, '86 47', are slang terms often associated with violence or assassination, making the post a subject of political debate and legal scrutiny.
  • The Secret Service is investigating if Comey intended to inspire acts of violence against the President or if he was merely unaware of the threat in his post. The case highlights the delicate balance between free speech and national security concerns in social media.

Read also:

Related

Latest