U.S. puts restrictions on visas for Guatemalan politicians and officials over democracy undermining allegations
The U.S. State Department slammed these actions as a clear attempt to discredit free and fair elections and hinder peaceful power transitions in Guatemala. These allegations stem from accusations against more than 100 Guatemalan congressmen and officials from the private sector, along with their families, of sabotaging democracy and the rule of law.
Recent legislative moves by the Guatemalan Congress to revoke the immunity of four out of five judges on Guatemala's Supreme Electoral Court, responsible for confirming election outcomes, have sparked significant international criticism and massive protests in Guatemala – the most populous country in Middle America.
The U.S. has imposed sanctions on several high-ranking Guatemalan officials, including those from the public prosecutor's office, for their alleged involvement in corrupt and undemocratic acts. The U.S. and other international bodies, like the European Union and Canada, have all responded with sanctions against these officials due to their efforts to undermine the democratic process and the rule of law in Guatemala [1].
For instance, the U.S. has sanctioned individuals such as Rafael Curruchiche, the chief of the FECI, and Judge Fredy Orellana for their involvement in corrupt and undemocratic activities. These sanctions are part of a wider strategy to keep these officials accountable for their actions and to support the democratic government of President Bernardo Arévalo [1].
It's important to note that the U.S. has not explicitly restricted visas for over 100 Guatemalan congressmen and officials, but there have been diplomatic actions and sanctions taken against certain Guatemalan officials and entities in response to their actions [1].
Relevant Insights
These developments in Guatemala reflect a broader trend of democratic erosion and corruption across Latin America. Countries like Peru, Ecuador, and Bolivia have all seen similar processes, leading to widespread protests and political instability. Experts warn that these trends have deeper roots, stemming from weak institutions, entrenched power structures, and insufficient political accountability [2].
