Skip to content

U.S. President Trump alleges that Hamas fabricated explosives using preservatives purchased by America.

Trump alleges that Hamas repurposed American-funded prophylactics to fabricate explosives, casting doubt on the veracity of U.S. financial backing for birth control in the region.

U.S. President Trump alleges that Hamas fabricated explosives using preservatives purchased by America.

Headline: Trump Accuses Hamas of Using US Condoms for Bomb Making, Claim Deemed False

In a bizarre turn of events, US President Donald Trump declared that the Islamic group Hamas used condoms, allegedly funded by the US, to manufacture bombs aimed at Israel. Addressing the public from the White House, Trump claimed, "We've stopped the sending of $50 million to Gaza to buy condoms for Hamas. $50 million. And do you know what they did with them? They used them as a method to make bombs."

However, an in-depth analysis by various sources reveals that this accusation is unfounded. The alleged $50 million funding for condoms was most likely intended for the Gaza Province in Mozambique, not the Gaza Strip. Furthermore, after a thorough investigation, it was determined that the US has not spent any money on condoms in the Middle East in recent years.

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) had allocated $60.8 million for condoms and female contraceptives globally in 2023. Intriguingly, only Jordan, among Middle Eastern countries, received around $45,000 in oral and injectable contraceptives.

Meanwhile, Israel has previously accused Hamas of causing hundreds of fires in the south of the country through primitive explosive devices attached to balloons, inflated condoms, or plastic bags filled with helium.

The origin of this $50 million condom claim appears to have stemmed from a mix-up between geographical locations and unsubstantiated allegations. The claim seems to have been politically motivated, with no evidence supporting the accusation that Hamas used US-funded materials for improvised explosive devices.

This accusation, filled with factual errors and inflated figures, serves as a striking example of the politicization of sensitive issues during presidential administrations. As we move forward, it is essential to critically examine claims and base our understanding on substantial evidence rather than unfounded allegations.

  1. Despite President Trump's assertion, an investigation unveiled that the supposed $50 million funding for condoms was intended for the Gaza Province in Mozambique, not the Gaza Strip.
  2. In the past, Israel has accused Hamas of igniting fires in the south of the country using improvised explosive devices attached to balloons, inflated condoms, or plastic bags filled with helium, but there is no evidence of them using US-funded condoms for bomb making.
  3. In 2023, Jordan was one of the Middle Eastern countries that received funding from the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) for oral and injectable contraceptives, yet no allocation was made for condoms in the Middle East.
  4. The origin of the $50 million condom claim appears to be a geographical mix-up and politically motivated, as no evidence supports the accusation that Hamas used US-funded materials for improvised explosive devices.
  5. The politicization of sensitive issues, such as war and conflicts, is clearly demonstrated by this incident, where unfounded allegations by presidential administrations can lead to misinformation and misunderstandings.
Trump alleges Hamas used American-funded rubbers for bomb production, raising doubts about U.S. financial backing of contraceptives in the region.
U.S. President Trump alleges Hamas repurposed American-funded prophylactics to fabricate explosives, casting doubt on the validity of American contraceptive funding in the Middle East.

Read also:

Latest