U.S. Elections: Lack of Substantial Differences in Choices Offered
In the realm of alternative media, The Burning Platform and Off-Guardian have raised questions about the significance of the US election, suggesting that votes may not hold the power to bring about real political change. This perspective is rooted in a belief that the political system is fundamentally controlled by powerful interests, leading to electoral outcomes that are manipulated or rigged.
According to these platforms, the 2020 election narrative was best served with a "Biden" in the White House. However, the entry of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. into the election was seen as an attempt to attract Covid skeptics. The authors argue that candidates often adopt personas to appeal to different demographics, creating an illusion of debate and democracy.
Regardless of who wins, the belief is that the results will lead to a continuation of the current state of affairs. For instance, Donald Trump, described as a "straight talking loudmouth" appealing to libertarians, old-fashioned conservatives, and the Bible Belt, is viewed as a globalist who willingly promoted the Covid lie and will continue to do so with Agenda 2030. On the other hand, Kamala Harris is characterised as "woke" with self-contradicting, double-talking insanity.
The authors imply that all candidates are puppets of globalism, regardless of the political figure, commentator, or show business personality. They encourage readers to focus on avoiding the destination (the state of affairs) rather than being distracted by the election. The implication is clear: your votes do not count, as the narrative-controllers have a preferred story and puppet at any given time.
This scepticism about the efficacy of voting is grounded in a worldview that unbridled human passions lead to governments that lack the power or will to truly represent the people or uphold democratic principles. As a result, the authors suggest that electoral processes are superficial or illusory, and genuine political power lies elsewhere, outside the vote itself.
While the specific details of their reasoning are not fully elaborated, these stances align with broader sentiments often expressed by alternative media commentators who argue that mainstream elections are influenced by elite agendas, systemic biases, or conspiracies that render individual votes ineffective in changing the status quo. The distrust in election integrity can be linked to perceptions that the government and political system are incapable of contending with unchecked human passions without being corrupted or manipulated.
As the 2024 US election approaches, these perspectives continue to challenge the traditional understanding of democracy and the role of the electorate in shaping the political landscape. Whether or not these views find widespread acceptance remains to be seen, but they serve as a reminder of the ongoing debate about the nature and purpose of elections in a complex and ever-changing political landscape.
- In the world of alternative media, articles discussing the 2024 US election might question the validity of voter power in shaping political change, as these platforms generally suggest that the political system is under the influence of powerful interests, leading to outcomes that are not truly representative.
- The truth about the effectiveness of voting in bringing about political change, according to The Burning Platform and Off-Guardian, is that it may be minimal, with policies and legislation deciding the country's trajectory more so than individual votes.
- These platforms argue that issues such as war-and-conflicts, migration, crime-and-justice, or even general news like car-accidents and fires are often impacted by policy-and-legislation decisions, rather than elections alone.
- Moreover, these alternative media outlets point towards a belief that mainstream electoral processes are illusory, serving as a distraction from real power players, thus questioning the integrity of elections in shaping the country's future.
- As the debate about democracy and the electorate's role in shaping the political landscape continues to unfold, it is crucial to consider the various perspectives – from the mainstream to alternative media – when evaluating the impact of voting and the role of individual voices in shaping policy and government.
