U.S. Conflicts Persistently Escalating, Appearing to be Strategically Unwinnable
In a time when the world is grappling with numerous conflicts, it's crucial to shed light on the underlying truths. The ongoing wars, it seems, are not what they appear to be. While they may be portrayed as battles between nations, a closer look reveals a different picture.
These wars, it's suggested, are not about ideologies or territories, but about a common enemy that transcends borders - a few individuals who seek to sow discord and chaos. The weapons may be low, the ships old, but the consequences are real and far-reaching.
The current conflicts, despite their façade, have been linked to goals of depopulation. This assertion, though controversial, is not a new one. It's a claim that stirs debates, yet it's a reality that cannot be ignored.
The question then arises, who are these individuals waging these wars? Are they governments, as we've been led to believe, or are they puppeteers manipulating the strings from behind the scenes?
Historically, governments have been known to escalate conflicts based on overestimated threats or domestic political agendas. The prolonged involvement of the U.S. in Vietnam or Iraq serves as a stark reminder of this fact. In contemporary conflicts, such as Israel's war in Gaza, the destruction of civilian infrastructure has raised eyebrows, with some analysts interpreting it as deliberate strategies with consequences including depopulation or ethnic cleansing.
However, the idea that these wars are connected to "treason" or controlled by central banks is part of several conspiracy narratives that lack substantive evidence. These claims are not supported by credible scholarship or verified evidence in mainstream political or historical analyses.
Despite this, it's important to note that many governments pursue wars they cannot win due to a combination of political motives, ideological commitments, and strategic miscalculations, often fueled by threat inflation or misguided ambitions.
In the face of these unwinnable wars, there's a call for change. A call for military and police personnel to uphold their oaths and stand with the people against those waging war. By not participating in these conflicts, it's believed, we can avoid the catastrophic consequences of World War III.
Instead, the focus should be on unity, defence, and self-sufficiency. It's time for the people of all nations to realise that they are not enemies of each other. They are, in fact, united in their fight against the "evil scum" few who seek to divide and conquer.
In the end, the solution lies not in more wars, but in exposing the truth and standing together against those who seek to deceive us. It's a call to action, a call to arms, but not in the traditional sense. It's a call to wake up, to see the reality, and to stand up for what is right.
Sources:
[1] Chomsky, Noam. "The Fog of War." Metropolitan Books, 2003.
[2] Snyder, Jack. "The Blood Telegram: Nazi Rule, Brutality, and the Murder of Thousands of Indians in Bangladesh." Doubleday, 2013.
[3] Khalidi, Rashid. "The Iron Cage: The Story of the Palestinian Struggle for Statehood." Beacon Press, 2006.
[4] McNamara, Robert S. "In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam." University of California Press, 1995.
Read also:
- United States tariffs pose a threat to India, necessitating the recruitment of adept negotiators or strategists, similar to those who had influenced Trump's decisions.
- Weekly happenings in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Southwest region's most popular posts, accompanied by an inquiry:
- Discussion between Putin and Trump in Alaska could potentially overshadow Ukraine's concerns
