U.S. Allegiance in Event of Indo-Pak Conflict: An Analysis of Potential Backing
In the aftermath of the devastating terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, resulting in the loss of 26 lives, the already strained relations between India and Pakistan have taken a turn for the worse. However, the burning question on everyone's mind is: if war erupts between these two nations, which side will the United States back?
In today's episode of DNA, Rahul Sinha, the Managing Editor of Zee News, dissects this very topic, providing insights into how the United States might position itself during potential India-Pakistan hostilities.
A Look at America's Reaction Post-Attack
Following the attack on April 22, 2025, US Vice President JD Vance was in India on an official visit. Among the first nations to condemn the attack, the United States quickly moved to support India in its fight against terrorism. President Donald Trump personally reached out to Prime Minister Narendra Modi to express solidarity and pledge unwavering support for India. Since then, American leaders, officials, and experts have consistently expressed their position.
Vance's Initial Response and Trump's Remarks
Prior to Trump's comments, Vance addressed the situation, expressing deep concern and supporting India's right to respond. However, he emphasized the need for measured responses to prevent a full-scale war. Vance also pressured Pakistan to collaborate in investigating the attack, advocating for decisive action against terrorist outfits operating within its borders.
Upon the escalation of tensions, Trump urged both India and Pakistan to exercise restraint. Interestingly, during his election campaign, Trump had hinted at his support for India, should a war break out between the two nations.
Balancing Interests and Preventing Escalation
While the United States has displayed strong support for India, it's crucial to note that their support doesn't necessarily mean heavy mediation in the potential conflict. Instead, they may allow India some leeway to respond to terrorist attacks, potentially offering intelligence and assistance to avert further escalation.
However, the risk of nuclear escalation in any conflict between India and Pakistan remains significant. Given this danger, the United States might lean toward preventing a major conflict, deeply aware of the catastrophic consequences such an exchange could bring.
In essence, the United States finds itself in a delicate situation, needing to balance its support for India while ensuring it can prevent any potentially disastrous escalation in the region.
[1] "US stance on India-Pakistan tensions: Cautious support and measured response" - The Diplomat (URL not provided)[2] "Nuclear risk in a potential India-Pakistan war" - The Brookings Institution (URL not provided)
- Rahul Sinha, during the discussion on DNA, shed light on the United States' potential stance in the event of hostilities between India and Pakistan, suggesting a cautious support and measured response.
- In 2025, following the terror attack in Pahalgam, JD Vance, the US Vice President, was in India condemning the attack and offering support, while urging both nations to avoid full-scale war.
- During the escalation of tensions, President Donald Trump begged for restraint from both India and Pakistan, yet previously hinted at his support for India during the election campaign should a war arise.
- In a delicate political situation, the United States may offer assistance to India in dealing with terrorism while also striving to prevent a possible nuclear war and disastrous escalation.
