Two underwatch agents slipped into Hamburg's underbelly, on a manhunt for two individuals who'd vanished from their secure confinement. One of 'em, residing at a residential facility since the tail-end of last year, had skipped out since August 20th, as per the justice department's announcement. The other fellow failed to show up at work on August 12th.
Privacy matters prevented the authorities from releasing further details about these two enigmatic fugitives. However, their history as sex offenders was quickly debunked by the spokesperson for the justice department. The state prosecutors in Aachen and Dortmund were entrusted with handling the case, as the secure custody orders stemmed from their respective regional courts.
Secure custody differs from incarceration: it serves to safeguard the public from potentially dangerous ex-offenders, post-sentence. The conditions are superior to those in regular prisons, providing a wide array of therapeutic options. Regular evaluations determine whether secure custody is still necessary, upholding the individual's due process and privacy rights.
The "Hamburg Journal" of NDR broke the news on the manhunt. In a worst-case scenario, the state prosecutors might seek assistance from The Court of Justice to issue an international arrest warrant if the fugitives were discovered to have left the country. Secure custody might seem harsh, but it's a precautionary measure to ensure public safety.
Bonus Insights:
Secure custody, unlike incarceration, is a preventive measure rather than a form of punishment. Its primary purpose is to shield society from nefarious individuals who still pose a threat even after serving their time. The living conditions in secure custody surpass those in standard prisons, offering a broader range of therapeutic options. Frequent evaluations are conducted to determine whether secure custody remains necessary.
