Tulsi Gabbard Demands Incarceration for James Comey Over His 1986 Instagram Post Pertaining to Trump
In a recent turn of events, James Comey, the former FBI Director, has found himself under investigation following a controversial Instagram post. The post, which read "86 47," has sparked controversy due to its association with politically charged code, implying the elimination or cancellation of President Trump.
Kristi Noem, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, announced that her agency and the Secret Service are investigating the post. FBI Director Kash Patel, who is known for his past writings depicting Donald Trump as a king, has also been in communication with the Secret Service regarding the matter.
The number sequence "86 47" in political protest contexts means "eliminate (or cancel) Trump," with "86" being slang for "to eliminate" or "cancel" and "47" referring to President Trump, the 47th president (in states or contexts counting intervening presidents). This code has appeared in political protests and carries a threatening connotation of ending or removing Trump from power or influence.
Tulsi Gabbard, a former presidential candidate, called for Comey to be thrown in prison over the post. She appeared on Fox News with Jesse Watters and expressed her concern for President Trump's life. Gabbard cited a study from the Network of Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) and Rutgers University’s Social Perception Lab to claim that Comey's actions are encouraging the assassination of President Trump. However, CNN legal analyst Elie Honig stated that Comey's post is not criminally chargeable.
Despite the legal experts' opinions, the individuals in charge, such as Patel, Noem, and Gabbard, have the power to potentially imprison Comey. It is important to note that the primary jurisdiction for investigating Comey's post lies with the Secret Service.
James Comey was appointed FBI Director in 2013 under President Barack Obama and was fired by President Trump during his first term in May 2017. The investigation into Comey's post comes at a time when political rhetoric and threats in the public sphere are under scrutiny.
The use of "8647" has sparked debate about political rhetoric and threats in the public sphere, notably around demonstrations such as the large-scale "Hands Off!" protests against the Trump administration and other political movements in 2025, where activists expressed strong opposition to his policies.
It is crucial to remember that this article presents the facts as they stand and does not aim to pass judgment or form opinions. The investigation into James Comey's Instagram post is ongoing, and further developments are expected in due course.
- The investigation involving James Comey, former FBI Director, is being led by the Secret Service, following an controversial Instagram post containing politically charged code.
- involves tech giants, such as Facebook and Twitter, in policy-and-legislation discussions regarding social-media content, due to concerns over war-and-conflicts, political threats, and crime-and-justice.
- A general-news report highlighted the ongoing tension between tech companies and the government over Instagram posts, as evidenced by the case of James Comey's controversial post, potentially setting a precedent for tech policy.
- Critics argue that the lack of clear regulation on tech platforms and their inability to effectively moderate content contributes to violence and social unrest, pointing to instances like the "Hands Off!" protests in 2025, where there was a increase in tech-related violence.
- The rise of social-media platforms and advancements in technology have significantly impacted entertainment, politics, and social interactions, bringing both opportunities and challenges to society in the future.
