Skip to content

"Trump's Opposition to Pacific Monument Fishing Restrictions Alarms Biodiversity Advocates and Island Nations"

Trump has issued a decree to allow commercial fishing within the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM).

Trump recently issued a decree, permitting commercial fishing within the Pacific Remote Islands...
Trump recently issued a decree, permitting commercial fishing within the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM).

"Trump's Opposition to Pacific Monument Fishing Restrictions Alarms Biodiversity Advocates and Island Nations"

A dramatic shift in marine protection policies was announced last month when President Trump signed a proclamation to open the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM) for commercial fishing. Conservationists express concern that this move will erase years of biodiversity progress and exemplify prioritizing commercial interests over environmental stewardship.

The America First Fishing Policy, enacted by the Trump administration, reverses protections that were in place for nearly half a million square miles of Pacific waters. The restrictions were aimed at safeguarding the marine space, a habitat for coral reefs, threatened species like the coconut crab and hawksbill turtle, and vital migratory fish populations, such as the bumphead parrotfish.

Trump contends that managed commercial fishing won't harm the historical and scientific sites protected by the PRIMNM, as tuna and other migratory fish aren't permanent residents of the monument's waters. However, marine specialists argue this view misunderstands the purpose of marine protected areas.

Now renamed the Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument by the Trump administration, the PRIMNM encompasses remote U.S. Pacific territories like Baker, Howland, and Jarvis islands; Johnston, Wake, and Palmyra atolls; and Kingman Reef, approximately 750 miles southwest of Hawaii's islands.

The president's order is suspected to have stemmed from mounting pressure from fishing industry groups, who assert that past bans have not yielded significant environmental success and only decreased economic gains. Taulapapa William Sword, Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council chair, stated that a well-regulated U.S. commercial fishing fleet is not only compatible with conservation objectives but also essential for national food security, economic resilience, and maritime presence in the Pacific.

Marine biologists warn that the decision could bring disorder to already starved ocean ecosystems facing the pressures of warming waters and acidification. The PRIMNM represents one of the world's more untouched marine environments, containing living coral ecosystems, rare bird species, and crucial migratory corridors.

"This is one of the world's most pristine tropical marine environments already facing dire threats from climate change and ocean acidification," said David Henkin, an attorney with Earthjustice's Mid-Pacific Office, adding that every effort will be made to shield the Monument.

The move towards commercial fishing access echoes a common industry argument - that the prior ban by former presidents did little to prevent overfishing because tuna and numerous other fish species are migratory. Nonetheless, experts assert that this misrepresents what marine protected areas are.

"MPAs serve as sanctuaries for marine life," notes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). These protected zones provide essential areas to support the life cycles of various marine species, building healthy, resilient oceanic ecosystems.

Critics question Trump's fishing order regarding potential further environmental harm, particularly regarding marine life and ocean conservation. "When we protect the oceans, we protect ourselves," said Sandy Aylesworth, Director of the Pacific Initiative for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Expanding protections is crucial to ensure ocean ecosystems can adapt to future stressors like climate change and industrial exploitation.

The order is facing legal resistance, with Earthjustice and other environmental groups planning legal action, citing an alleged abuse of the Antiquities Act. Trump's decision might mark the beginning of more significant environmental challenges ahead, especially in terms of marine life and ocean conservation.

  1. The America First Fishing Policy, enacted by the Trump administration, reverses protections for marine space, including areas in the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM), which houses coral reefs, endangered species like the coconut crab and hawksbill turtle, and vital fish populations.
  2. The renamed Pacific Islands Heritage Marine National Monument is now open to commercial fishing, erasing years of biodiversity progress and potentially prioritizing commercial interests over environmental stewardship.
  3. Marine specialists assert that this view misunderstands the purpose of marine protected areas, as they serve as sanctuaries for marine life, providing essential areas for various species to support their life cycles and build resilient oceanic ecosystems.
  4. The move towards commercial fishing access raises concerns about potential further environmental harm, particularly regarding marine life and ocean conservation.
  5. Marine biologists warn that the decision could bring disorder to already stressed ocean ecosystems, facing pressures from climate change and ocean acidification.
  6. The PRIMNM, one of the world's more untouched marine environments, contains living coral ecosystems, rare bird species, and crucial migratory corridors.
  7. Critics question the Trump administration's fishing order and allege that it may constitute an abuse of the Antiquities Act.
  8. Environmental groups plan legal action against the decision, citing its potential to mark the beginning of more significant environmental challenges ahead, especially in terms of marine life and ocean conservation.

Read also:

Latest