Skip to content

Trump's lawsuit worth millions against The New York Times has been dismissed by a judge, citing the complaint as overly lengthy, unnecessary, and lacking substance.

Republican millionaire disregards federal procedure mandating succinct explanation for financial compensation, given 4 weeks to revise submission.

Trump's million-dollar lawsuit against The New York Times dismissed due to excessive length,...
Trump's million-dollar lawsuit against The New York Times dismissed due to excessive length, redundancy, and lack of substance.

Trump's lawsuit worth millions against The New York Times has been dismissed by a judge, citing the complaint as overly lengthy, unnecessary, and lacking substance.

In a recent ruling, a federal judge has dismissed U.S. President Donald Trump's $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times. The judge, identified as Merryday, appointed by the U.S. judicial system, stated that a lawsuit is not a public forum for insults and invective, nor a protected platform to vent against an adversary.

The dismissal was due to a violation of a federal procedural rule by President Trump. Specifically, the lawsuit lacked a concise statement of why Trump deserves damages. The judge gave Trump a 28-day deadline to file an amended lawsuit of no more than 40 pages to address these procedural issues.

It's important to note that this dismissal does not affect any ongoing legal proceedings or investigations involving President Trump. Additionally, the dismissal does not necessarily mean that the claims made in the lawsuit are false or unfounded.

Access to the exclusive article from ABC/Reuters, which provides no new factual information, is only available to registered users who are subscribers. Logging in is necessary to read the full article. The specific date and location of the ruling are not mentioned in the sources.

The judge's ruling underscores the importance of adhering to procedural rules in legal proceedings. It also highlights the distinction between a lawsuit as a means for redress, rather than a platform for personal attacks. The amended lawsuit, if filed, will be closely watched as it progresses through the legal system.

Read also:

Latest

Protests planned for this coming Saturday

Massive protests scheduled for Saturday

Massive protests scheduled for Saturday On September 20th, two significant demonstrations are set to take place in Cologne's inner city. The "March for Life" and a counter-protest under the motto "Pro Choice" will both gather at Neumarkt square. The Cologne police will be providing