Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times is dismissed as 'inappropriate' and 'forbidden' by the judge
In a significant development, U.S. President Donald Trump's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times has been rejected by a federal judge. The ruling was made in the US District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Judge Victor Marrero, who presided over the case, stated that the suit did not follow federal rules for filing civil complaints. He asserted that the complaint read like a pro-Trump news today, with repeated references to lawsuits he has filed against other media outlets. The judge also noted that the suit was "decidedly improper and impermissible."
Four Times reporters, including two who wrote a book for Penguin Random House, were named as defendants in the lawsuit. However, no response has been provided by Penguin Random House regarding the lawsuit.
The president's legal team has indicated that it will submit an updated complaint, addressing the logistical issues mentioned by Judge Steven D. Merryday. The team has been given a month to refile the lawsuit, and it will be limited to 40 pages or fewer, as directed by the judge.
Dana Bash contributed reporting to the article. New York Times executive editor Joe Kahn has stated that Trump is "wrong on the facts" and "wrong on the law" regarding defamation. He added that The New York Times will continue to report on matters of public interest without fear or favor.
The lawsuit accused The New York Times of being a "virtual mouthpiece" for the Democratic Party. However, Kahn reiterated that the newspaper's reporting is based on facts and the law, and it will not be swayed by political affiliations.
In response to the dismissal, a spokesperson for Trump's legal team stated that the president will continue to hold the media accountable through this lawsuit. Kahn also stated that they will fight the lawsuit and win.
Numerous legal experts have stated that the lawsuit is meritless. The New York Times has not responded to a request for comment on the decision. The case is expected to be closely watched as it could set a precedent for future defamation lawsuits against the media.
In conclusion, the dismissal of Trump's defamation lawsuit against The New York Times marks a significant victory for the media's First Amendment rights. The case will likely have far-reaching implications for future defamation lawsuits against media outlets.
Read also:
- United States tariffs pose a threat to India, necessitating the recruitment of adept negotiators or strategists, similar to those who had influenced Trump's decisions.
- Weekly happenings in the German Federal Parliament (Bundestag)
- Southwest region's most popular posts, accompanied by an inquiry:
- Discussion between Putin and Trump in Alaska could potentially overshadow Ukraine's concerns
