Trump's Impact on Special Education: A Guide for Parents and Educators

Trump's Impact on Special Education: A Guide for Parents and Educators

The Department of Education (DoE) has been undergoing significant changes under the current administration, with implications that reach far beyond the realm of general education. One of the most contentious issues is the proposed move of special education programs from the DoE to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) assigns oversight of special education programs to the DoE's Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Any attempt to move these programs to HHS would require congressional action, and legal challenges have already been filed against such a move.

If the transfer were to occur, there are several key implications to consider. Firstly, a shift in disability framework could see disabilities primarily viewed as medical conditions rather than educational and social issues. This medicalizing tendency could undermine the current educational approach that emphasizes accommodations, differentiated instruction, and inclusion.

Secondly, accountability and enforcement concerns arise. The federal role in enforcing IDEA ensures states uphold obligations to provide free appropriate public education (FAPE). The DoE conducts compliance reviews and investigates complaints. Shifting oversight to HHS or fragmenting responsibility with the State Departments of Education could weaken accountability, potentially leading to more states and districts neglecting children's rights, reducing protections for students with disabilities, and complicating dispute resolution for families.

Thirdly, funding and resource risks are a concern. Most special education funding comes from general education budgets, and budget cuts to education disproportionately affect special education services. The proposed dismantling or downsizing of the DoE could lead to decreased funding and support at the national level, adversely impacting services and expertise necessary for low-incidence disabilities and innovative practices.

Fourthly, the potential for increased family choice comes with mixed outcomes. Recent reform efforts by the DoE have emphasized increasing options for families, including access to charter, private, and online programs aimed at personalized learning. However, shifting to HHS and allowing IDEA funds to pay for private schooling (vouchers) has not historically improved outcomes consistently and may divert resources from public schools.

Lastly, practical challenges in service delivery could arise. The complexity and success of special education rely on education professionals' expertise and educational accommodations rather than medical treatment. Overseeing from HHS could add layers of bureaucracy and reduce educational expertise in decision-making, possibly causing delays and inefficiencies.

In addition to these concerns, the DoE has experienced significant staffing reductions. The department was down to roughly 2,183 workers as of mid-March, from 4,133 workers on the day of Trump's inauguration. This has led to the decimation of the department's statistics arm and the Office for Civil Rights, which investigates complaints that schools are violating the rights of students with disabilities.

Moreover, two grants researching school-to-work transition services for youth with disabilities have been canceled, and a $45 million contract aimed at improving the post-graduation outcomes of high school students with disabilities has also been canceled.

These changes have left about 12,000 civil rights complaints pending before Trump took office, more than half concerning students with disabilities. The Nation's Report Card, which provides a comprehensive look at how schools across the country are educating students, may also be affected by the staffing changes.

These developments have prompted strong opposition from stakeholders and lawmakers, who fear that the changes could undermine the legal foundation of IDEA enforcement, shift the understanding of disability away from education-centered inclusion, weaken federal accountability, jeopardize funding, and introduce risks of medicalizing educational needs.

1. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) currently assigns oversight of special education programs to the Department of Education (DoE)'s Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
2. If the special education programs were moved from the DoE to the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), it could potentially lead to disabilities being primarily viewed as medical conditions rather than educational and social issues.
3. The federal role in enforcing IDEA, which ensures states uphold obligations to provide free appropriate public education (FAPE), could be weakened if oversight is shifted to HHS or fragmented with the State Departments of Education.
4. The proposed move of special education programs could adversely impact funding and support at the national level, potentially decreasing funding and expertise necessary for low-incidence disabilities and innovative practices in education.

Read also: