Skip to content

Trump to unveil crime- combatting actions in Washington; calls for federal authorities to assume authority over the city

Capital mayor defends self-rule, criticizes Trump for exploiting individual occurrences, specifically the assault on a DOGE employee, to further political agendas.

Trump will disclose actions aimed at combating crime in Washington; intends to transfer authority...
Trump will disclose actions aimed at combating crime in Washington; intends to transfer authority of the city to the federal government

Trump to unveil crime- combatting actions in Washington; calls for federal authorities to assume authority over the city

In a surprising move, President Donald Trump has announced plans to strengthen federal control over Washington D.C., citing the city's rising crime rates as justification. According to official figures from the Metropolitan Police, violent crimes have decreased by 12% so far in 2025, but homicides and armed robberies have seen a particularly marked drop. However, vehicle thefts have decreased by more than 30%, with most crimes being committed by minors.

The proposed changes come amidst controversy, as they could lead to significant legal and political consequences. The Posse Comitatus Act, which generally prohibits the U.S. military from engaging in domestic law enforcement, does not apply to the D.C. National Guard when activated under Title 32, allowing guard members some law enforcement capabilities like arrests, but with limits on direct law enforcement involvement.

The District of Columbia Home Rule Act, section 740, allows the President to take control of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department in emergency conditions for up to 30 days without congressional approval, making D.C. unique compared to states where governors control the Guard and police. Since Washington, D.C. is a federal enclave, the President has unusually broad authority over its National Guard and police, unlike states, where governors must consent.

Such intervention in D.C. can be seen as a federal power grab, with critics calling it a racially and politically motivated attempt to undermine Democratic-led city governments, particularly those led by Black mayors. Federal takeover can override local elected officials' control, causing disputes about jurisdiction and local autonomy.

However, proponents argue that such intervention can restore order amid rising crime, protecting federal workers, citizens, and tourists, and ensuring efficient functioning of federal institutions in the capital. The potential precedent for military presence on U.S. soil that differs from normal traditions of separating military and civilian law enforcement roles could normalize stronger federal military involvement in domestic issues.

Trump's plans have received opposition from Democrats, who accuse him of exaggerating city violence. Vice President JD Vance shared a graph showing a murder rate of 41 per 100,000 people in Washington D.C., higher than several other capital cities. However, Democrats cite a 26% decrease in violent crimes this year, a 12% decrease in homicides, and a 20% decrease in armed robberies.

On Monday, President Trump will hold a press conference at the White House to announce measures aimed at stopping violent crime in Washington D.C. The attack on an employee of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been a significant catalyst for these proposals, as well as the high-profile attack on "Big Balls" in a central area of the city, which has generated debate about the involvement of young people, many underage, in crimes such as robberies and vehicle thefts.

This news article aims to provide a clear and concise summary of the current situation, avoiding opinions or unrelated information. For a more comprehensive understanding, further research is encouraged.

  1. The proposed changes to increase federal control over Washington D.C.'s law enforcement, as announced by President Trump, have sparked debates about federal power, military involvement in domestic issues, and potential violations of local autonomy, given the District's unique status and Trump's historical political controversies.
  2. In the realm of general news, the ongoing discourse encompasses not only the potential impact of strengthened federal intervention on crime rates in Washington D.C., but also the implications for civil rights, political motivations, and the precedent it sets for future military engagement in domestic conflicts and war-and-conflicts.

Read also:

    Latest