Trump reportedly contemplating removal or confinement of political adversaries.
He's baaack, baby! Donald Trump is making headlines again in his second term, but not for the reasons you'd hope. Rather than focusing on his promises to weed out the undocumented immigrants, it's his strategies to instill fear and potentially silence his opponents that have got everyone's attention.
Consider this: our man Trump has publicly expressed his support for using force against American adversaries more than 100 times in a span of two years. How's that for a clear message? And let's not forget the infamous chat with the Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele where he casually mentioned, "homegrowns are next." It seems he's referring to the "domestic criminals" who've called the United States their home.
Now, here's the scary part: expelling American citizens from the U.S. is illegal, regardless of their criminal record, according to various expert opinions. But is our current president deterred by such restrictions? Seems not! "The government doesn't appear overly concerned with following the law and the Constitution," says Matthew Boaz, an immigration law professor at the University of Kentucky.
Apart from causing chaos, there are indeed legal methods to imprison those who've committed crimes or expel those with invalid migration status. However, the government, according to Boaz, "seems to prefer to operate outside the law." Unsurprisingly, this approach is ineffective, as it results in numerous court battles and a growing pile of lawsuits.
Take a look at the cases in point: the detention of a permanent resident, Mahmoud Khalil, whose convictions could potentially compromise foreign policies; Kilmar Abrego Garcia's expulsion, which was "mistaken," according to the administration; and the mysterious disappearance of another man, whose family couldn't even locate him after his arrest and rapid expulsion by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
The case of Abrego Garcia is particularly alarming, as it raises the question: can the Trump government imprison anyone, anywhere in the world? The term "disappearance" is now commonly used to describe arrests carried out by masked agents in broad daylight. Those with opinions against Trump are slowly being eliminated from the public sphere.
"We can't help but connect what's happening here with the many cases of forced disappearances in Latin America," Kate Doyle from the National Security Archive pointed out in an online conference. "The actions can't be viewed solely through the lens of immigration."
With all this chaos, concerns are growing that this power-hungry administration might not stop at targeted immigrants. Professor Boaz fears that "what's happening to immigrants, including permanent residents, could happen more broadly, even to citizens." And it's not just talk: even Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has expressed worries that the legal arguments used by Trump's allies regarding deportations to El Salvador could result in the deportation and imprisonment of American citizens without consequence.
To make matters worse, three American citizen children were recently deported to their parents' home country. "It's unconstitutional to deport a citizen to another country," Boaz clarified. Yet, this isn't a completely unheard-of practice – Jacqueline Stevens, a political scientist from Northwestern University, has spent years researching cases of American citizens being deported.
In summary, while there's no concrete proof that Trump is systematically preparing to detain political opponents in the style of authoritarian regimes, it's disquieting to see such a clear pattern of cracking down on dissent and creating an atmosphere of fear. After all, if the administration has no qualms about targeting immigrants, what's stopping them from expanding their reach?
Further Reading:
- Trump's National Security Advisor is out
- Judge halts deportations based on an 18th-century law that Trump uses
- Why is Trump obsessed with Biden?
Troubling Defiance:
"I'm concerned that the tactics used against immigrants, including permanent residents, could be used against citizens in the future," says Boaz. And, according to the Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Trump's allies seem to believe they can deport and imprison anyone, including American citizens, without repercussions, as long as they take action before the courts intervene.
Suggested Reading:
- Six years later, a refugee is still awaiting his children
- The frustrating delays in getting permanent residency in Quebec continue
- Trump dismisses his National Security Advisor
- Mike Waltz leaks military strike information to a journalist over Signal
- Trump orders the government to cease funding public media PBS and NPR
- Trump orders the government to stop funding the two public networks.
- The propositions by Donald Trump in his second term, including his support for forceful measures against American adversaries and his chilling remarks about domestic criminals, have accumulated war-and-conflicts, crime-and-justice, and politics general news.
- The deployment of force against American adversaries, potentially including American citizens, and the proposed policies for deporting undocumented immigrants, have sparked concerns that Trump's strategies may be designed to instill fear and silence opponents.
- In light of the Trump administration's policies, discussions about potential deportations and targeted detentions have extended beyond immigration and policy-and-legislation into broader aspects of society.
- The Trump government's approach to immigration enforcement, which appears to operate outside the law, has resulted in an increasing pile of lawsuits and court battles, raising questions about the legality and propriety of its actions.
- As concerns grow about the reach of the Trump administration's tactics, specialists like Matthew Boaz have expressed apprehension that methods employed against immigrants, including permanent residents, might be applied more broadly, even targeting American citizens.
