Skip to content

Trump intends to boost EU tariffs up to 35%

Trump issues warning to EU, threatening a 35% increase in import tariffs if investment promises in the US economy remain unmet as part of ongoing trade disagreements.

Targets increased EU tariffs with a proposed hike to 35%
Targets increased EU tariffs with a proposed hike to 35%

Trump intends to boost EU tariffs up to 35%

Headline: European Union and United States Sign Controversial Trade Deal Under Trump Administration

The European Union and the United States have reached a significant trade agreement, marking a turning point in transatlantic economic relations. The deal, signed on July 28, comes after intense negotiations and pressure from President Trump, who has been vocal about his desire for a more favourable trade arrangement with Europe.

Background

The trade deal, which was concluded after Trump pressured the EU to act, has been met with mixed reactions. Some experts have described it as "hates the EU," suggesting potential negative consequences for European industry. The deal imposes a 15% tariff on many EU goods, such as cars, wine, and machinery, while exempting others like aircraft and pharmaceuticals. This tariff regime constrains European exporters and adds costs to European industries reliant on US markets.

Key Long-term Implications and Impacts

The deal also includes several other significant provisions. The European Union agreed to purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy over three years, a substantial increase from previous imports, to strengthen U.S. energy dominance and reduce Europe’s reliance on adversarial sources. This shifts European energy sourcing and may impact European energy companies.

The EU has also committed to invest $600 billion in the U.S. economy during Trump’s term, enhancing economic ties but potentially redirecting investment flows away from European domestic industries or other global regions. From a broader perspective, the deal fits into a European strategy to maintain the US as a security ally by making economic concessions in trade and defense spending (with NATO defense targets rising from 2% to 5% of GDP).

However, the tariffs and trade barriers retained for some EU goods risk negatively affecting European manufacturers and exporters by reducing their competitiveness and market access in the US, potentially leading to industrial slowdowns or shifts in production. Negotiations aim to reduce non-tariff barriers to U.S. exports, which might improve some market access for U.S. firms but could create trade friction if the EU requires reciprocal adjustments impacting their own industries.

Future Challenges

The implementation of the trade deal could potentially lead to a reduction in tariffs on European goods in the US. However, the deal is contingent on the EU meeting its investment commitments in the American economy. President Trump has threatened to raise import tariffs to 35% if the EU fails to meet its investment commitments. The trade deal may not be fully implemented until the EU meets its investment commitments.

In the long term, the trade deal could lead to an outflow of investments and pressure on European industry. The EU's acceptance of these terms is influenced by the desire to secure US security cooperation, but these economic concessions may come at the expense of European industrial competitiveness and economic autonomy in the long term.

The deal also includes a provision for the EU to buy American weapons, which further adds to the complex mix of economic and strategic considerations involved in the agreement.

While the deal is hailed by the US as a win for American workers, manufacturers, and energy sectors, the European industry faces increased tariffs, pressure on exports, and potentially forced shifts in energy and investment patterns. The full implications of the trade deal are yet to be seen, but it is clear that it will have a significant impact on both sides of the Atlantic.

[1] Politico, July 29, 2025 [2] The Guardian, July 29, 2025 [3] Financial Times, July 29, 2025

  1. The controversial trade deal between the European Union and United States, signed under the Trump Administration, has stirred up discussions in the realm of sports policy-and-legislation, with athletes and sporting goods manufacturers raising concerns about the potential impact of increased tariffs on their industries.
  2. Amidst the general news centered on the economic implications of the EU-US trade deal, political analysts have highlighted its potential influence on the transatlantic relationship, suggesting that future trade agreements and international alliances could be seen through a lens of politics rather than solely economic factors.

Read also:

    Latest