Trump dismisses the employment figures, aligning with his strategy of undermining unfavorable statistics
=====================================================
In recent years, there have been numerous claims about President Donald Trump manipulating or discrediting data in various areas. Let's delve into these allegations and the evidence supporting them.
Economic Data (Job Numbers)
Trump has accused the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) job numbers of being "phony" and "rigged," alleging that the BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer falsified data to hurt his political prospects and benefit his opponent, Joe Biden. However, there is no evidence supporting these claims, and McEntarfer was a career economist confirmed with strong bipartisan support. The administration has not provided proof for these allegations, and revisions to job data are normal statistical practice, not evidence of fraud [1].
Election Data and Results
The Trump administration has been reported to pursue efforts that could undermine election integrity, including mishandling voter file data, pressuring state officials for voter purges, and fostering distrust in election outcomes. These actions have increased risks of voter intimidation, doxing, and foreign interference, and have been criticized as attempts to discredit or manipulate election results. This aligns with broader actions that discourage enforcement of voting rights and erode trust in elections [2].
Climate Change
Historically, Trump has been known for dismissing or undermining scientific consensus on climate change, though specific recent examples were not found in the given timeframe.
Other Actions
- In 2019, Trump displayed a map in the Oval Office that had been altered with a black Sharpie to include Alabama in the potential path of Hurricane Dorian, despite forecasters pushing back saying Alabama was not at risk.
- Trump suggested that there should be less testing during the coronavirus pandemic, stating that more testing would lead to more cases.
- Trump claimed that the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections were rigged, despite losing both elections.
The July jobs report revisions showed a distressed economy, with a sharp slowdown in hiring. The firing of the labor statistics commissioner might make the data less dependable, according to Betsey Stevenson, a University of Michigan economist and a former chief economist at the Labor Department. Kolko underscored the importance of ensuring federal statistics are trustworthy not just for government policymakers but for companies making hiring and investment decisions [3].
References:
[1] https://www.brookings.edu/research/trump-and-the-jobs-numbers-the-truth-about-the-bureau-of-labor-statistics/ [2] https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/21/us/politics/trump-legal-challenges-election.html [3] https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/06/trump-fires-bureau-of-labor-statistics-commissioner-amid-jobs-report-slowdown.html
- The government's handling of economic data, particularly job numbers, has been a subject of controversy under President Donald Trump, with claims of manipulation and disagreements over the accuracy of the data provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
- Microsoft and other big tech companies have expressed concern over the Trump administration's actions that could potentially undermine election integrity, such as data mishandling and voter purges, which could threaten the overall political climate and general news.
- A significant revamp in the economy, as shown in the July jobs report, has raised questions about the reliability of government-provided data, with experts like Betsey Stevenson of the University of Michigan voicing their concerns.
- As the impacts of climate change continue to unfold, President Trump's earlier dismissal and undermining of scientific consensus on the matter have raised concerns about the administration's policy-and-legislation approaches to business and the economy.
- With accusations of rigged elections, falsified data, and general distrust in election outcomes, the political landscape has been marked by controversy not just within the United States but also internationally, with various organizations and countries scrutinizing the administration's actions and statements.
