Trump demands legal action against Beyoncé for purported Harris endorsement payment
In a significant move for the 2024 presidential election, pop icon Beyoncé lent her support to Vice President Kamala Harris during a rally in October. At the event, Beyoncé declared, "It's time for America to sing a new song," echoing Harris' presidential bid.
The endorsement has sparked much discussion, particularly around a figure of $11 million that has been associated with Beyoncé's support. However, the search results do not provide a source or explanation for this figure. The Federal Election Commission has no record of an $11 million payment to Beyoncé from Harris' presidential campaign, and the Harris campaign has previously rejected rumours of a $10 million payment for her endorsement.
Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, addressed the rumours in a November 2024 Instagram post, calling the $10 million figure "false information" and a "lie." She added that Beyoncé "actually paid for her own flights for her and her team."
Prior to the endorsement, it was clear that Harris was a fan of Beyoncé. This was evident when Harris attended Beyoncé's Renaissance World Tour in 2023. Oprah Winfrey, too, was present at the rally, but she clarified that she was not paid a 'personal fee' for her appearance.
During her speech, Beyoncé emphasised her role as a mother, stating, "I'm not here as a celebrity. I'm not here as a politician. I'm here as a mother." She also asserted, "Your freedom is your God-given right, your human right."
The endorsement by Beyoncé, one of the most influential figures in the entertainment industry, is likely to have a significant impact on the election. However, it's essential to separate fact from fiction when it comes to the financial aspects of the endorsement.
Read also:
- Today's most impactful photographic moments
- Support for Eric Adams in The Post's Letters to the Editor on August 13, 2025
- Roosting Shark and Rambunctious Red Squirrels: Unconventional House Rental in Yorkshire Involving Aquatic Marvel, Squirrely Mayhem, and Mystical Planning Regulations
- Legal Dispute Dismissed with Humor: Supreme Court Laughs off Another Civil Matter Mislabeled as Criminal Prosecution
