Skip to content
general-news — Broadcaster — Politics — Broadcast — Television — War-and-conflicts — Ip — Media — Content

Trump Commands CPB to Withdraw Funding from PBS, NPR

Media landscape evolving accused, allegedly biased journalism used as rationale by President.

,   and  ASMedia
3 min read
Evolving media landscape and alleged biased reporting, according to President, serve as...
Evolving media landscape and alleged biased reporting, according to President, serve as justifications

Trump Commands CPB to Withdraw Funding from PBS, NPR

Rewrite

Donald Trump, the 45th President, took an unprecedented step on Thursday by issuing an executive order that aims to pull the plug on funding for Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR). The move raises concerns about the independence and diversity of news media.

The order, which Trump justified under the pretext of modern media landscape evolution, lambasts the broadcasters, established back in 1967, for allegedly promoting biased coverage. But, detractors argue that this move is simply an attempt to silence critics and stifle a free press.

One month prior, in a fiery post on Truth Social, Trump portrayed NPR and PBS as "radical left monsters" and urged Republicans to sever ties with them. With no signs of backing down, the former president's refusal to budge has raised eyebrows in political circles.

Approximately 40 million Americans tune into NPR radio weekly, and 36 million watch a PBS local television station monthly. Despite Trump's contentious views, public broadcasting plays a pivotal role in rural areas devoid of broadband or multichannel video services.

The order asserts that with the plethora of news available today, government-funded media is outdated, unneeded, and erodes the appearance of journalistic autonomy. However, it's important to note that no media outlet has a constitutional right to public funding, and the government has the authority to determine which sectors deserve subsidies.

The order further accuses the CPB of violating impartiality principles since it provides funding to NPR and PBS. Yet, it's the quality and objectivity of their reporting, not their political leanings, that ultimately matters to the American public.

CPB, which administers over half a billion dollars in taxpayer funds annually, responded by affirming its independence from federal government intervention. In March, at a Congressional hearing, Alaska Public Media's President Ed Ullman underscored the importance, particularly in remote areas, of public media as the "only locally operated, locally controlled broadcasting service."

The CPB's President and CEO, Patricia Harrison, stated that the organization is a private, non-profit entity that operates independently, unlike federal agencies subject to presidential control. The CPB Board declined to follow the order, asserting that Congress has explicitly forbidden any attempts at federal control over educational television or radio broadcasting.

In response, NPR President and CEO, Katherine Maher, praised the organization's commitment to fair, accurate, and unbiased reporting. She vowed to defend their work and its editorial independence, recognizing the importance of telling the country's stories honestly, accurately, and impartially.

It appears that Trump's executive order is an attempt to bypass the ongoing funding allocation process in Congress and shut down federal funding to the broadcasters outright. This might signal the first step towards a heated battle over the preservation of public broadcasting in America.

As the situation unfolds, public support for preserving public broadcasting remains steadfast. MoveOn, a progressive advocacy group, has launched a petition to protect these vital services. Meanwhile, the legal and political fallout from this controversial edict is just starting to unfold.

***

Stay tuned for updates on this developing story...

CBRE Analytics: Understanding Trends in Media Consumption in the United States

Nielsen: Journalism Has Always Faced Challenges, But New Ones Demand Innovation

Pew Research Center: How Americans Consume the News Today

Knight Foundation: Local News Crisis: An Examination of Local News Deserts in the United States

Wikipedia: Public Broadcasting Act of 1967

USA.gov: Public Broadcasting

Congressional Research Service: Federal Funding for Public Broadcasting

  1. The FCC, as a regulatory body for media, could play a crucial role in upholding the independence and diversity of news media, particularly in the face of recent policy and legislation that aims to limit funding for Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) and National Public Radio (NPR).
  2. The broadcaster's commitment to general news, war-and-conflicts, and politics ensures they offer consumers a well-rounded perspective on current affairs, a responsibility increasingly important in an evolving media landscape.
  3. An analysis by CBRE Analytics reveals shifting media consumption trends in the United States, with more people relying on video content and Internet Protocol (IP) services for their daily news consumption.
  4. The ongoing debate about government funding for media outlets presents an opportunity to reassess the role of public broadcasting in remote areas where broadband or multichannel video services are scarce, filling the void left by private corporations.
  5. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) might need to revisit its policy regarding funding for public broadcasting in light of the changes in the media landscape and the importance of maintaining a diverse and unbiased news media.
  6. advocacy groups like MoveOn have mobilized the public in support of preserving public broadcasting, acknowledging its crucial role in providing impartial and informative news coverage that is otherwise scarce in areas facing a local news crisis.

Read also:

Related

Latest