Skip to content

Trump authorities send 8 migrants to South Sudan

Migrants' Deportation to South Sudan Halted by Lawsuit, Diverting Them to a U.S. Military Base in Djibouti Instead

Migrants forcibly removed from U.S. to South Sudan by Trump government
Migrants forcibly removed from U.S. to South Sudan by Trump government

Trump authorities send 8 migrants to South Sudan

In a controversial move, the Trump administration has deported eight men with serious criminal convictions to South Sudan, a country experiencing armed conflict and political instability. The group, which included individuals from Asia and Latin America, had been detained in difficult conditions on a U.S. military base in Djibouti after a lengthy legal battle.

The men, who were not originally from South Sudan, had been convicted of crimes such as murder, sexual assault, and robbery. Their deportation followed a lawsuit that had initially blocked the move, citing concerns over their safety and the legality of sending individuals to a country where they had no ties and where their well-being could be at risk.

A district judge had noted the U.S. State Department’s "do not travel" warning to South Sudan and expressed concern about the potential danger to the men’s well-being. However, the U.S. Supreme Court ultimately allowed the deportations to proceed, siding with the Trump administration.

The Court’s majority found that lower courts had overstepped their bounds in blocking the deportations after recent Supreme Court orders, and stated the administration could return for further assistance if needed. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, criticizing the ruling as giving the administration preferential treatment and enabling what they viewed as lawlessness.

The case raises concerns about deporting individuals to dangerous countries with which they have no ties and the legality of such third-country deportations under U.S. law. Trina Realmuto, one of the lawyers representing the group of men, stated that because of the Supreme Court’s procedural ruling, the men were denied an opportunity to contest their deportations to South Sudan based on their fear of torture or death.

Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, from the Department of Homeland Security, argued that a district judge’s order could not dictate the national security and foreign policy of the United States of America. The Supreme Court's decision is another win for the Trump administration’s unprecedented effort to deport immigrants to countries with no ties and where they may face mistreatment.

Sources: [1] The New York Times [2] The Washington Post [3] The Associated Press

The Supreme Court's decision to allow the deportation of eight men with criminal records to South Sudan, a country experiencing conflict and instability, sparked controversy, with Justices Sotomayor and Brown Jackson dissenting over concerns that the ruling gives preferential treatment to the administration and potentially enables lawlessness. The case has raised questions about the legality of third-country deportations and the right of immigrants to contest their deportation to nations where they may face mistreatment.

Read also:

    Latest