Skip to content

Trump asserts that unfavorable media coverage of him is "truly illicit"

President's mysterious stance on constitutional-protected negative news coverage perplexes, as he alleges it to be against the law, a contrast shared by none of his predecessors.

Media coverage critical of Trump deemed illegitimate by Trump himself
Media coverage critical of Trump deemed illegitimate by Trump himself

Trump asserts that unfavorable media coverage of him is "truly illicit"

In a statement made in the Oval Office on Friday, President Trump accused news reporters who cover his administration negatively of breaking the law. This latest remark further escalated his condemnations of the press and raised concerns about the freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment.

The President's statement did not clarify what constitutes manipulating news stories for Trump or what constitutes negative news coverage. Trump also did not specify which laws were being broken by manipulating news stories, nor did he provide evidence to support his claims that journalists have broken the law.

Trump's statement represents a broadening of his attacks on journalists and their First Amendment right to report the news. Journalists and media figures have been critically reporting on the Trump administration's use of power to intimidate critics and censor dissent. These actions have raised concerns about violations of free speech protections, although no specific laws were cited as violated by the journalists themselves in the last week’s reports.

The statement in the Oval Office did not indicate any legal action taken or planned against the journalists. However, Trump suggested that manipulating news stories to be negative could be illegal, and he implied that such reporters who cover his administration negatively could be considered lawbreakers.

This is not the first time Trump has attacked the press. His statements in the Oval Office are the latest in a series of attacks on the press by the President. The statements are seen as an attack on the freedom of the press guaranteed by the First Amendment, and they have sparked widespread criticism and concern.

It remains to be seen how the administration will respond to the criticism and whether any legal action will be taken against journalists. For now, the statements in the Oval Office serve as a reminder of the ongoing tension between the President and the press, and the importance of the freedom of the press in a democratic society.

Read also:

Latest