Trump asserts that power plants don't contribute to air pollution. However, climate scientists deem this assertion as illogical or nonsensical.
🔵 The Smokescreen Unveiled: Trump Administration called out for德國石油 few-facts fumble on climate change impact
The Trump administration is at odds with a gaggle of climate scientists who allege the US government's handling of climate change facts is eerily reminiscent of trying to pass off arsenic as harmless.
This week, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a new plan to ease regulations on greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants emitted by power plants that rely on fossil fuels. In the proposal, the EPA maintained that carbon gas emissions "from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not significantly contribute to dangerous air pollution."
Related 🔸 Living here? You're breathing Europe's deadliest air
However, 19 scientists—climate, health, and economics specialists—have forcefully refuted the EPA's statement, labeling it as disinformation.
Here's what five of them had to say:
'It's basic science'
Zeke Hausfather, a climate scientist at Stripe and the temperature monitoring group Berkeley Earth, branded the administration's conclusion "utterly nonsensical."
Philip Mote, an Oregon State climate scientist, voiced his sentiment, stating, "It's basic chemistry that burning coal and natural gas releases carbon dioxide, and it's basic physics that CO2 warms the planet. We've known these simple facts since the mid-19th century."
Howard Frumkin, former director of the US' National Center for Environmental Health and a retired public health professor at the University of Washington, noted "coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change," which increases the risk of heat waves, catastrophic storms, infectious diseases, and many other health threats."
Related 🔸 Curbing waste in laughing gas reduces climate change impact
'These are indisputable facts," he added.
Kathy Jacobs, a climate scientist at the University of Arizona, pointed out that the EPA's claim is "in direct conflict with evidence presented by thousands of scientists from almost 200 countries for decades."
Finally, Stanford climate scientist Chris Field, who coordinated an international report linking climate change to devastating extreme weather, put it succinctly: "It is hard to imagine a decision dumber than putting the short-term interests of oil and gas companies ahead of the long-term interests of our children and grandchildren."
- Climate changes
- Public health
- Power plants
- Air pollution
- Fossil fuels
- Pollution
- The EPA's claim that carbon gas emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants do not significantly contribute to dangerous air pollution is strongly disputed by climate scientists, as it goes against basic science and widely accepted facts.
- Climate changes, public health, power plants, and air pollution are closely linked, with scientists pointing out that coal-and gas-fired power plants contribute significantly to climate change, increasing the risk of various health threats.
- In the realm of environmental science and policy-and-legislation, it has been noted that prioritizing the short-term interests of oil and gas companies over the long-term interests of future generations, as demonstrated by claims like the EPA's, can be considered a decision with far-reaching consequences in the field of general news.
